CNN said that the tower that collapsed was built in the 19th century. I agree with you that it probably had to do with construction (an iconic building close to me erupted in flames during a renovation, due to welding equipment). Of course they should rebuild it--pardon the metaphor, but it's like Lenin: most of the original isn't there any more anyway, and lots of things have been added over the centuries. There will I hope be a core of original work that survives the fire. (Flying buttresses were, I thought, a medieval invention to keep the walls up because their engineering was rudimentary at best.) If they can restore it to the same "look and feel" it had before, they should. After the destruction of World War II, it would have been a further catastrophe not to try to reconstruct what was lost. The same argument applies here, I think.It's way too soon to make any statements on causes and right now all efforts have to focus on putting the fire out. There was renovation work going on, scaffolds all over, so it might have been a stupid accident (they happen).
After this is over, the question will be whether there's going to be a will to rebuild, in order to maintain the cultural tradition (even under normal circumstances you have to constantly replace parts of old cathedrals, their value is not in the question of whether that is all really the same stone that was put there originally ... )
Same feeling I had when he was elected...For a few seconds I had hope that this is a fake
When the attack on the world trade center happened, there was a conspiracy theory that the CIA did it and not the exploding plane full of fuel because a mere "fire wouldn't cause the skeleton to melt like that". Engineering "experts" were quoted to bolster the claim. I've also read that the model of how fires spread (and that was used to convict arsonists) used in the United States was wrong, and they only found out by deliberately torching buildings in experiments. Fires like the world trade center and Notre Dame are so rare that no one is really sure what will happen. That also makes them hard to fight. I assume that if the construction contractor is deemed responsible, they will go bankrupt. I hope that the fire authorities won't be subjected to second-guessing and criticism: there is no way they could have rehearsed this and gotten it perfect. (Some of them apparently went inside an old, burning, collapsing building to try to salvage what they could.)I was wondering what would happen if the Louvre went up, or the Vatican museums. They surely have some sprinklers, but that would be bad for the art (although it would keep fires from spreading--basically sacrifice some for all). I imagine that it would have been difficult to have sprinklers in Notre Dame, and if it had been proposed it would have been fiercely opposed.I just turned in the TV to see this happening. The fire still looks pretty bad. The German TV even speculates right now if one of the main towers is on fire, too.
But they say that it looks like there were no casualties or injured. If that turns out to be true, that's probably the best news that could come out from this.
When things like this happen, I am always annoyed by the reporters suddenly turning into experts for ANYTHING. At the station that I have turned in, they are right now even guessing how many litres of water you need to put the fire out. Judging the situation before something official has been announced, that is just disrespectful.
And I just listened to "Play that funky music, white boy" (really, I did)... Call 911On a musical note to commemorate Good Friday. A performance of the final chorale of Passio Domini nostri J.C. secundum Evangelistam Matthæum (The Passion of our Lord J C following the Evangelist Matthew; GR: Matthäus-Passion; ENG: St. Matthews Passion) by Johann Sebastian Bach - 1727. Performed by Malmö Chamber Choir and orchestra on April 8, 2009, in Lund Cathedral, Sweden. IMHO, the greatest work of sacred music ever written.
ANZAC Day down under.
Gallipoli cost Winston Churchill his cabinet post (and probably should have). It also cost the life of Henry Mosley (British) of the Royal Engineers, who established the science behind the periodic table with his X-ray experiments. (One book I have says "that alone made the war an obscenity"). One has to ask what it takes for the high command to get it right. The only general I know who seemed to have the right mix of energy and prudence was Ulysses Simpson Grant. The only admiral was Chester W. Nimitz.ANZAC Day down under.
As indeed did India and the African colonies, very largely airbrushed out of the narrative of both WWs.Australia (and Canada and New Zealand), with small populations, certainly paid their dues to the British Empire, and to the world.
Armenian Genocide Remembrance Day - it comes right next to Anzac Day, which we celebrate tomorrow.
Another terrible example of cruelty to an ethnic minority, a final solution predating Hitler and the Jews.
It also has a thematic interest for us here at CF, although I don't think there is actual evidence of female crucifixion beyond the well known film Ravished Armenia/Auction of Souls
View attachment 699411
View attachment 699412View attachment 699413View attachment 699414
So called "populists", who serve their egos not the people.Thanks Gibbs.
The words of Attaturk (pic #4) are very poignant. The speak of the bonds that have grown up between our countries, the Anzacs always respected the Turks as opponents, and in turn we were reassured that our dead were lying in the soil of a friendly country.
Erdogan, in keeping with modern "statesmen", has reversed this and made highly inflammatory remarks for the sake of his domestic audience. This is our world, very sad. Erdogan is no Attaturk, he threatens the legacy of Attaturk.
https://www.radionz.co.nz/news/chch...-s-comments-about-anzacs-spark-diplomatic-row
https://www.abc.net.au/radionational/programs/drive/tensions-ease-over-turkish-president-erdoğans-anzac-comments/10927108
ps lovely weather today for those attending the thousands of dawn services around the country.
Sydney
View attachment 699868
Canberra
View attachment 699867
and of course Gallipoli
View attachment 699866
and small towns and cities everywhere
Mostly agree, but don't forget Cold Harbor!I know who seemed to have the right mix of energy and prudence was Ulysses Simpson Grant.
I'd include Bull Halsey. And you can't exclude Nelson. "Any Captain who puts his ship next to one of the enemy, hasn't gone wrong."The only admiral was Chester W. Nimitz.
Australia (and Canada and New Zealand), with small populations, certainly paid their dues to the British Empire, and to the world.
Are the photos authentic? which is the source?
There are a lot of good Generals and Admirals. Bill Slim in Burma and Harwood in at the River Plate for example.Gallipoli cost Winston Churchill his cabinet post (and probably should have). It also cost the life of Henry Mosley (British) of the Royal Engineers, who established the science behind the periodic table with his X-ray experiments. (One book I have says "that alone made the war an obscenity"). One has to ask what it takes for the high command to get it right. The only general I know who seemed to have the right mix of energy and prudence was Ulysses Simpson Grant. The only admiral was Chester W. Nimitz.
Australia (and Canada and New Zealand), with small populations, certainly paid their dues to the British Empire, and to the world.
View attachment 699910
Yes, Cold Harbor. He regretted it.Mostly agree, but don't forget Cold Harbor!
I'd include Bull Halsey. And you can't exclude Nelson. "Any Captain who puts his ship next to one of the enemy, hasn't gone wrong."
View attachment 699993