• Sign up or login, and you'll have full access to opportunities of forum.

Tv Heroines

1 is crucified, 1 is Impaled, 1 is publicly raped then set free. You decide! (Pic's below)

  • Karen Crucified: Maggie Impaled: Claire Raped then set free

  • Maggie Crucified: Claire Impaled: Karen Raped and set free

  • Claire Crucified: Karen Impaled: Maggie Raped and set free

  • Maggie Crucified: Karen Impaled: Claire Raped and set free

  • Claire Crucified: Maggie Impaled: Karen Raped and set free

  • Karen Crucified: Claire Impaled: Maggie Raped and set free

  • Karen is raped, crucified for 2 days then impaled. Maggie and Claire are set free

  • Maggie is raped, crucified for 2 days then impaled. Claire and Karen are set free

  • Claire is raped, crucified for 2 days then impaled. Karen and Maggie are set free


Results are only viewable after voting.
Go to CruxDreams.com
Same here. I would have to google them, and even then would not care about punishing or crucifying them. I don't generally go through life wanting to crucify or flog people. I am happy to engage in the fantasy with people, but to show me a random celeb beautiful woman and ask what to do with her, I sort of turn off. Do whatever you like. Put her in a story and convince us that there's some reason to whip her (even if it's just that she happened to be there at the time), or some reason to punish her (some sort of plausible context) or crucify her.
You use a random pic as a focus. It just happens to be something every one can look at and relate to. A type of figure or character is quickly shown in a pic. Sometimes you don't have time to write an epic story. Sometimes a quick pole serves a purpose. Horses for courses I guess :).
 
I have maybe answered 3 of these things in my tenure here.

I certainly didn’t mean to cause trouble by my comment.

Seriously though!

Famous people, stars, celebrities are forbidden subjects.

That aside, I do think most of these polls are nonsensical.

 
One interesting question that this thread has brought up is this;

At what point does somebody become too famous to appear on this site?

What I mean by this is that we all accept the fact that we can't post fantasies involving Hollywood A-listers or pop stars etc, but what about Youtube stars, or reality tv "stars" (and I use the word "star" quite wrongly but you know what I mean. Or what about glamour models or porn stars? Within their own world, many of these are also considered famous or high profile. At some point you could extend this to include just about anyone (random amatuers grabbed from google images etc).

So at what point do you become too high profile?

Not meant as a challenge to the rules here, but just an interesting question...
 
What I mean by this is that we all accept the fact that we can't post fantasies involving Hollywood A-listers or pop stars etc, but what about Youtube stars, or reality tv "stars" (and I use the word "star" quite wrongly but you know what I mean. Or what about glamour models or porn stars?
We do use nude models quite frequently, with little thought for provenance. I have used silver screen stars of the silent era. The line is kind of blurry.
 
I have maybe answered 3 of these things in my tenure here.

I certainly didn’t mean to cause trouble by my comment.

Seriously though!

Famous people, stars, celebrities are forbidden subjects.

That aside, I do think most of these polls are nonsensical.
I don't think you caused any trouble.
I was just wondering why you didn't like poll's! I think there great for the reasons I listed above. :)

It is an interesting question and it kind of links in with the fappening and all the stuff that came out of that. I think if your a celebrity you have to be ok with people fantasizing about you. Your images and you become public. Therefore you become public property to a degree. I really believe most would even enjoy the fact they are fixated upon.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
It is an interesting question and it kind of links in with the fappening and all the stuff that came out of that. I think if your a celebrity you have to be ok with people fantasizing about you. Your images and you become public. Therefore you become public property to a degree. I really believe most would even enjoy the fact they are fixated upon.

I am going to say terrible poll but you have provoked an interesting debate Joker.

I would disagree with the idea that a celebrity has to be okay with people fantasizing about them. Not everyone enters a public space of their own volition and further what about cases such as the case of Alison Stokke who was just trying to be an athlete and a student when her pics (which were merely of her doing her sport) went global?

I do suppose it is different where a celebrity actively markets their sexuality but they still remain people and I am sure you'll agree we have to observe a basic level of respect for that person's humanity.
 
I am going to say terrible poll but you have provoked an interesting debate Joker.

I would disagree with the idea that a celebrity has to be okay with people fantasizing about them. Not everyone enters a public space of their own volition and further what about cases such as the case of Alison Stokke who was just trying to be an athlete and a student when her pics (which were merely of her doing her sport) went global?

I do suppose it is different where a celebrity actively markets their sexuality but they still remain people and I am sure you'll agree we have to observe a basic level of respect for that person's humanity.
Why is it a terrible poll? Stop being so judgey people come on here to orgasm. It doesn't have to be Monet! 21 people have voted and if it turned even 1 person on it was worth it! Jeez it's just a random post.
 
Last edited:
I am going to say terrible poll but you have provoked an interesting debate Joker.

I would disagree with the idea that a celebrity has to be okay with people fantasizing about them. Not everyone enters a public space of their own volition and further what about cases such as the case of Alison Stokke who was just trying to be an athlete and a student when her pics (which were merely of her doing her sport) went global?

I do suppose it is different where a celebrity actively markets their sexuality but they still remain people and I am sure you'll agree we have to observe a basic level of respect for that person's humanity.
I don't know who Allison Stoke is, but I agree we must respect people's humanity. A fantasy and reality are very different.

All I can say is if I were a celebrity who had done some nude or sex scenes I would have no problem in people having them or using them.
 
Why is it a terrible poll?

Well that is a matter of taste I suppose but I just looking at this as so limiting in its range of options, there are in fact only two options both fairly grisly and yet you have asked people to pick through multiple variations of them. I will concede the grisly can be fuel for dark sexual fantasy but I think you could perhaps have shown more ingenuity about outcomes. That though remains a matter of personal taste, hence the statement "I say".

All I can say is if I were a celebrity who had done some nude or sex scenes I would have no problem in people having them or using them.

I think in some ways you have a fair point as far as you go but lack a certain empathy. The phrasing is telling "I would have no problem" because you are overlaying your own personal preferences on to someone else rather than trying to understand someone else. I am not denying having done the exact same thing myself, I try to avoid it but it must still happen. However to my mind one of the great joys of the BDSM range of kinks are the insights it gives you into human behaviour and the range of personality.

Discovering what makes a partner tick and how to fulfil their emotional and yes because those are often most fun, sexual needs is one of the great joys of the BDSM style of sexual/emotional play. However respecting boundaries is also fundamental to BDSM and one of the things most of us learn early on is that everyone has different boundaries.

Also context, say someone does a nude scene in a film detailing an historical abuse or atrocity...Ravished Armenia is a classic example and I have used some of the surviving stills myself so I am not claiming should not use such scenes in fantasy creation or to be an arbiter of what is right and wrong. However we should consider the context of the nude images before automatically assuming the actor would be alright with it. So a certain respect for the real persons behind the images is probably worth reaffirming when you get the chance especially for those amongst us who jump down the darker rabbit holes of the human psyche.

Again I do not wish to say do or do not but I am saying be aware that behind that image is a real human being with all the rights and dignities of a real human being and that it is quite appropriate that from time to time people will express a concern for that.
 
I thought Claire Randall would have more votes. Y'all must not watch Outlander. Trust me guys and especially the girls watch outlander! The witch trial episode alone :)
 
Again I do not wish to say do or do not but I am saying be aware that behind that image is a real human being with all the rights and dignities of a real human being and that it is quite appropriate that from time to time people will express a concern for that.
I think it possible if not probable that at some point in the fairly near future we may well be asked to delete the images of a 'non-celebrity' model with the threat of their lawyer following up if we don't.
 
I think it possible if not probable that at some point in the fairly near future we may well be asked to delete the images of a 'non-celebrity' model with the threat of their lawyer following up if we don't.
I think there are many images on here that may be suspect if a person recognised themselves may get asked to be taken down famous or not!
 
I think it possible if not probable that at some point in the fairly near future we may well be asked to delete the images of a 'non-celebrity' model with the threat of their lawyer following up if we don't.
I am slightly surprised that we haven't heard from anyone yet. Perhaps the reason is that people who do nude photos may not wish to call attention to their IRL identity (any more than we do). Additionally, most of the photos we use have been "shopped" to some extent, so a Google phot0 finder might have difficulty matching patterns. Then again, the celebrity and non-celebrity photos we use may be reasonably old, and so not really traceable. And then there is the simple fact that it is often costly, tedious, and unrewarding for people whose images are on the internet to track down all these instances and issue "cease and desist" orders (which they could do, presumably, as could any photographer whose work we have "lifted" for manips). It's a bit like 'whack a mole', which makes it less likely to happen.

However likely it is, I think RR makes a good point. Whether a celebrity (or other person) enters public life as an actor or model, even doing nude scenes or photos, they do not contract to have their images used explicitly for having people reach orgasm, or to have their image used at all except for purposes of the film or photoshoot. They may realize that there is a risk that images are used for other purposes, but one should not attribute exhibitionism to actresses. Just because a girl is okay doing a sex scene in a movie, doesn't mean she's also up for getting done by Weinstein in his hotel room. I think we need to remain aware of the reality of the people behind the photos. We don't mean any disrespect (and indeed we seem to show a great deal of admiration for some of these models, i.e. Alice), but how that would be interpreted outside our insulated walls here is anyone's guess.

I suspect someone like Emma Watson may not be flattered to see herself manipped onto a whipping post, whether or not she can control whose body her face has been "shopped" onto lately. An occupational hazard that one lives with is not the same thing as finding it acceptable or desirable.
 
I am slightly surprised that we haven't heard from anyone yet.
I'm not for two reasons. First, as much as many of us here care about this site, in the universe of the internet it's a niche within a niche. Alexa rankings have CF at #242,063.
Second, it's non-commercial. The images are generally owned by the studios not the actor and the studios care about $s.

However likely it is, I think RR makes a good point. Whether a celebrity (or other person) enters public life as an actor or model, even doing nude scenes or photos, they do not contract to have their images used explicitly for having people reach orgasm, or to have their image used at all except for purposes of the film or photoshoot. They may realize that there is a risk that images are used for other purposes, but one should not attribute exhibitionism to actresses. Just because a girl is okay doing a sex scene in a movie, doesn't mean she's also up for getting done by Weinstein in his hotel room. I think we need to remain aware of the reality of the people behind the photos. We don't mean any disrespect (and indeed we seem to show a great deal of admiration for some of these models, i.e. Alice), but how that would be interpreted outside our insulated walls here is anyone's guess.

What about porn stars? Surely Little Caprice doesn't think people watch her movies for the plot or the depth of character development. I doubt Alice thought she was making documentaries on Roman history. But even for legitimate actors or models, they can't control people's fantasies any more than your hot next door neighbor can (my next door neighbor is a guy, but I can dream can't I?). Weinstein is a problem not because he fantasized about doing those actresses, but because he actually did them or tried to.

My preference though is not to use celebrities in my stories, mostly because I find it more interesting to invent my own characters.
 
Personally in the few stories that I have written I have used the names of members of Cruxforums (or based on names of Cruxforumers).
I have assumed that that is OK as the names are fictitious in any case and we are all into crucifixion.

In my story of "Elalia on the Orient Express" my Eulalia cannot actually be the Cruxforums Eulalia as my story is set in the 1890's.
For the Cruxforums Eulalia to have been in her 20's in the 1890's she would have to have been borne in the 1870's.
For her to be alive today she would be over 140 years old, which seems a tad unlikely.
 
Personally in the few stories that I have written I have used the names of members of Cruxforums (or based on names of Cruxforumers).
I have assumed that that is OK as the names are fictitious in any case and we are all into crucifixion.

In my story of "Elalia on the Orient Express" my Eulalia cannot actually be the Cruxforums Eulalia as my story is set in the 1890's.
For the Cruxforums Eulalia to have been in her 20's in the 1890's she would have to have been borne in the 1870's.
For her to be alive today she would be over 140 years old, which seems a tad unlikely.
Many of us use each other in stories. Don't worry about the age thing. Whether she was born in the 1890s or 20 years from now, Eulalia will probably read herself into your story anyway, if it hits her imagination the right way. ;)
 
I'm not for two reasons. First, as much as many of us here care about this site, in the universe of the internet it's a niche within a niche. Alexa rankings have CF at #242,063.
Second, it's non-commercial. The images are generally owned by the studios not the actor and the studios care about $s.



What about porn stars? Surely Little Caprice doesn't think people watch her movies for the plot or the depth of character development. I doubt Alice thought she was making documentaries on Roman history. But even for legitimate actors or models, they can't control people's fantasies any more than your hot next door neighbor can (my next door neighbor is a guy, but I can dream can't I?). Weinstein is a problem not because he fantasized about doing those actresses, but because he actually did them or tried to.

My preference though is not to use celebrities in my stories, mostly because I find it more interesting to invent my own characters.
Well said guys! I have to admit that's another thing that's come up artist's photos! I mean taking out real people photos famous or not, posting the art and manips of art that isn't yours is another can of worms!

That's it from now on strictly photos of ourselves for a truer freer world! :)
 
Personally in the few stories that I have written I have used the names of members of Cruxforums (or based on names of Cruxforumers).
I have assumed that that is OK as the names are fictitious in any case and we are all into crucifixion.

In my story of "Elalia on the Orient Express" my Eulalia cannot actually be the Cruxforums Eulalia as my story is set in the 1890's.
For the Cruxforums Eulalia to have been in her 20's in the 1890's she would have to have been borne in the 1870's.
For her to be alive today she would be over 140 years old, which seems a tad unlikely.
I've had Eulalia aged about 1400 years in some of my stories! :doh:

Well said guys! I have to admit that's another thing that's come up artist's photos! I mean taking out real people photos famous or not, posting the art and manips of art that isn't yours is another can of worms!

That's it from now on strictly photos of ourselves for a truer freer world! :)
Dammit, Joker, I'm going to go and have a vote. This thread's been great fun! ;)
 
I've had Eulalia aged about 1400 years in some of my stories! :doh:


Dammit, Joker, I'm going to go and have a vote. This thread's been great fun! ;)
Drat. Can't. Every option includes rape :(

What's wrong with me? :confused: Is crucifixion better than rape? :doh:
 
Back
Top Bottom