willowfall
Senator
Not bad at all. The "dead" girls need to learn to hang a little more realistically in the ropes but not bad.
kisses
willowfall
kisses
willowfall
-
Sign up or login, and you'll have full access to opportunities of forum.
A Real Archer In Training
- Thread starter admihoek
- Start date
ShadowWolf
Tribune
The muscular posture in the 2nd picture is a fascinating picture that one could stare at going over each inch of her lovely body for hours to discover how her body holds and maintains the use of the bow
foggybottom
Venator imaginum
**Vetta A** as the ""Jungle Queen.
cruxlover
Tribune
Very nice, though I question whether a Jungle Queen would have shaved pubes - let her be hirsute I say.
Crux-Emperor Baracus X
Rectidolor
A skimpy leopard print loincloth would be nice....Very nice, though I question whether a Jungle Queen would have shaved pubes - let her be hirsute I say.
RacingRodent
Consul
Very nice, though I question whether a Jungle Queen would have shaved pubes - let her be hirsute I say.
The ancient Egyptians shaved or sugared (think waxed but even more painful
) off every hair because of issues with biting insect infestations. Entirely possible that a jungle queen might decide itching is only worth it for the head.
willowfall
Senator
The ancient Egyptians shaved or sugared (think waxed but even more painful
Women clearing away unwanted hair (using a variety of methods) is as old as documented history.
Sometimes it is for comfort or health issues and sometimes it is fashion. The concept that it is somehow class or status related is strictly a modern concept.
It is basically that way throughout human history. Even cultures in the same time period have (or had) different grooming preferences and concepts of beauty.
I have found with my lovers prefer clean shaven. How did my partner put it "I really don't want to fumble around in the bush looking for Nirvana."
Of course if you are a slave girl, Master gets what Master wants (or else).
kisses
willowfall
ShadowWolf
Tribune
The Master's method of removing the hair could prove most interesting by injecting pain with the removal of the hair which could induce orgasms. Seeing the Master's slave girl having orgasms could please the Master very much
foggybottom
Venator imaginum
Very nice, though I question whether a Jungle Queen would have shaved pubes - let her be hirsute I say.
I much prefer natural pubes myself as I love digging around in the bush. But I too suppose she may be trying to eliminate habitat for ticks, chiggers, lice and maybe even crotch crickets since she is frolicking in the "jungle".
Last edited:
I much prefer natural pubes myself as I love digging around in the bush. But I too suppose she may be trying to eliminate habitat for ticks, chiggers, lice and maybe even crotch crickets since she is frolicking in the "jungle".
Natural is the way to go
now back on topic
ShadowWolf
Tribune
Natural is the way to go
now back on topic
View attachment 723078View attachment 723079View attachment 723080View attachment 723081View attachment 723082View attachment 723083View attachment 723084
Love the 2nd one and the sheer power shown in using the bow displayed in this artwork's subject
willowfall
Senator
As much as I love my bows I'll take the automatic with the grenade launcher for $200 Alex.
Thank you very much.
kisses
willowfall
ShadowWolf
Tribune
How about a bow with arrows that have an arrowheads that explode on impact?
willowfall
Senator
Nope, I can get 30 rounds out of the semi faster than I can get 2 out of the quiver. Besides do you have any idea of limited the range of an arrow with a 40mm grenade on the business end is? Attempting direct fie with one of those might get you killed.
kisses
willowfall
RacingRodent
Consul
The thing is that the available evidence strongly suggest that warbow effective range was not much greater than 50 yards anyway, a modern semi-automatic pistol can typically match that under most circumstances. As Willow, I think, is trying to allude to, you can carry a lot more pistol ammo far more comfortably and load it a magazine at a time giving you much more ready to fire in any emergency.
willowfall
Senator
Well as phrased that is sort of misleading. The current testing would seem to indicate that the longbow was not effective as a direct fire weapon against plate armor at more than 50 yards or so by the end of it's career.
Yet there is plate armor in existence which clearly indicates that they were penetrated by a bow of some type.
We also have to remember that a full plate suit was incredibly expensive and was a minority of the type of armor deployed on any battlefield.
And certainly the long bow destroyed French cavalry based armies several times during the 100 years war.
In it's time (virtually from the dawn of recorded warfare) depending on the weapon and how it was deployed the bow (of all types) was an incredibly effective weapon. It's displacement from the battlefield as a stand off weapon only came after firearms were able to be mass produced at a relatively small per unit cost and quickly.
I'm good (not great) with the cross, horse and long bow able to effectively deal with targets out to 60 yards at a rate of aimed fire of about a shaft every 10 seconds (With a cross bow about 1 bolt every 20-30 seconds).
However if I was facing an opponent with an M16, their rate of fire is a 100 times mine (assuming they had a clip that big) and the effective range is something over 400 meters.
Not a fair match and if I'm going to be in a fight I want to be on the side of the guys being unfair.
kisses
willowfall
I used to be quite good with a longbow - able to hit close to centre of target in range conditions (not battle stress, obviously) without sights with a similar rate. I was on my university team. That said, I haven't practiced in a number of years now, so I can't claim any current prowess.
This girl looks like she would be more deadly than me.
willowfall
Senator
SIGHTS!
No real archer ever uses sights!
Congrats on being a real archer.
kisses
willowfall
ps: Nobody is shooting back at me either. What did wes Hardin used to say "It is no the man who gets off the first shot who wins the fight, it is the man who gets off the first aimed shot that wins."