• Sign up or login, and you'll have full access to opportunities of forum.

Sex Slaves

Go to CruxDreams.com
I have to make an observation about black sex slaves. In our little lesbian BDSM club, we have one young lady of color. She is very interested in learning about woman on woman torture sex. She is an enthusiastic learner , but I notice she has an aversion to being whipped. I believe, due to her cultural heritage she may be over sensitive to that. Like myself, she is a sub by nature. Just observation.
 
I have to make an observation about black sex slaves. In our little lesbian BDSM club, we have one young lady of color. She is very interested in learning about woman on woman torture sex. She is an enthusiastic learner , but I notice she has an aversion to being whipped. I believe, due to her cultural heritage she may be over sensitive to that. Like myself, she is a sub by nature. Just observation.

As a descendant of slave owners in the American South, I am glad as HELL my ancestors lost the Civil Goddam War, for these sins among many others.
 

Attachments

  • F1A0EF3E-58A3-4910-8920-558793CD7E7F.gif
    F1A0EF3E-58A3-4910-8920-558793CD7E7F.gif
    38.1 KB · Views: 351
  • EBFA9CD3-1517-476B-9BED-CC6E61D7E9C3.jpeg
    EBFA9CD3-1517-476B-9BED-CC6E61D7E9C3.jpeg
    33.5 KB · Views: 346
  • 98137722-9461-435D-869B-B19383107743.jpeg
    98137722-9461-435D-869B-B19383107743.jpeg
    84.9 KB · Views: 345
  • 6182B3E5-0752-4726-A4D0-ADF39273567E.jpeg
    6182B3E5-0752-4726-A4D0-ADF39273567E.jpeg
    368.3 KB · Views: 435
It is all fun and games until it isnt

Like crucifixion, best confined to fantasy.

Other slave related activities, not so much. Damian addresses to the theme fairly often.
 

Attachments

  • 3FE6A040-9338-4C02-BAC8-EC0B941D604B.jpeg
    3FE6A040-9338-4C02-BAC8-EC0B941D604B.jpeg
    257.6 KB · Views: 517
  • 2B01E20C-8C79-48C2-AF4A-10D84C2B9758.jpeg
    2B01E20C-8C79-48C2-AF4A-10D84C2B9758.jpeg
    159.3 KB · Views: 524
  • B5C0DC7F-F41E-4813-B5A6-EB9BCF79BD0E.jpeg
    B5C0DC7F-F41E-4813-B5A6-EB9BCF79BD0E.jpeg
    141.8 KB · Views: 566
  • AA8BE63D-3CEC-4CA8-BB99-587812F9A737.jpeg
    AA8BE63D-3CEC-4CA8-BB99-587812F9A737.jpeg
    93.3 KB · Views: 589
I have to make an observation about black sex slaves. In our little lesbian BDSM club, we have one young lady of color. She is very interested in learning about woman on woman torture sex. She is an enthusiastic learner , but I notice she has an aversion to being whipped. I believe, due to her cultural heritage she may be over sensitive to that. Like myself, she is a sub by nature. Just observation.

I dont believe thats the reason. I had a former gf. She was born and raised in Kenya, came to the western world as an aupair-girl and did stay. She really loved to be whipped while having sex. She bought chaines and a whipp and some other equipment for our sexual adventures. She had a lot of pleasure while playing the role of a sexslave.

But maybe the negros of families of former slaves have another view to bdsm-games like that.
 
I have to make an observation about black sex slaves. In our little lesbian BDSM club, we have one young lady of color. She is very interested in learning about woman on woman torture sex. She is an enthusiastic learner , but I notice she has an aversion to being whipped. I believe, due to her cultural heritage she may be over sensitive to that. Like myself, she is a sub by nature. Just observation.
Maybe her aversion to being whipped is that it bloody well hurts.
 
As a descendant of slave owners in the American South, I am glad as HELL my ancestors lost the Civil God damn War, for these sins among many others.

Slavery is an ongoing problem even today (and yes to some extent in America, sex trafficking is slavery folks) but anybody from the south should NOT believe the propaganda that is current in America today.

Slavery was not an evil created by white to oppress blacks, in fact it was a continental wide institution that didn't "officially" end in Africa until 1905 and existed thousands of years before America was "discovered" by the Europeans. In America prior to the Revolution there were white slaves (NOT indentured servants) and there were both African and Native American slave owners u[ to the Civil War (which was not a war against slavery. the destruction of slavery was an outcome of the war not the initial objective of the American government).

Now none of the above makes what happened in slavery in America acceptable by modern standards but also remember the idea that slavery is "officially" evil (as in that view point was supported by a number of strong governments) is only about 150 years old.

Before that, for well over 5,000 or so years of recorded history, it was perfectly acceptable.

The young lady from Kenya probably has a much better historical perspective of slavery in Africa than African-American do so that is why she attached different connotations to it.

And liking being whipped or being a slave is all a matter of individual preferences.

kisses

willowfall
 
I think it is well known that I write about slavery.

The triangular trade that shipped slaves to the Americas was a fairly recent business and was relatively short lived.

Slavery has existed for as long as agriculture has. Slavery is certainly not a case of white owners and black slaves. In East Africa the Barangid Persians in Kilwa were shipping out slaves well over 2000 years ago. That trade lasted until finally (officially) abolished in 1897. African slavers raided Europe for slaves until well into the the 19th Century. Some raided as far afield as Iceland! White slaves girls, and boys, From the Black Sea area were very popular in the Ottoman Empire, and further south. In 1878 the Zanzibari Sultan Baragash, returning from a State Visit to Queen Victoria, did a little shopping detour too Constantinople. Among his purchases were eight Circassian slave girls for his harem.

There is certainly modern slavery, at all levels.
 
Just read that in 1833 in order to pay for the Abolition of Slavery Act the British Govt. agreed to pay 40% of the annual budget as compensation to companies and slave owners. They borrowed a huge amount of money which was not finally paid off until 2015. The Tweet revealing this was by HM. Treasury but has now been pulled. So, the working classes of the UK continued to pay for the good life enjoyed by the wealthy descendants of the slave trade for generations. I feel a bit peeved at that.
 
Just read that in 1833 in order to pay for the Abolition of Slavery Act the British Govt. agreed to pay 40% of the annual budget as compensation to companies and slave owners. They borrowed a huge amount of money which was not finally paid off until 2015. The Tweet revealing this was by HM. Treasury but has now been pulled. So, the working classes of the UK continued to pay for the good life enjoyed by the wealthy descendants of the slave trade for generations. I feel a bit peeved at that.
Well, you can't just confiscate someone's valuable property without compensation. That would be theft.
 
Slavery was not an evil created by white to oppress blacks, in fact it was a continental wide institution that didn't "officially" end in Africa until 1905 and existed thousands of years before America was "discovered" by the Europeans. In America prior to the Revolution there were white slaves (NOT indentured servants) and there were both African and Native American slave owners u[ to the Civil War (which was not a war against slavery. the destruction of slavery was an outcome of the war not the initial objective of the American government).

Willow, the key difference between American slavery and that of antiquity or the rest of the Americas was that manumission was not a possibility. That, and blacks by law and the Dred Scott decision could never be anything other than chattel property. Further, the Civil War wasn’t fought to end slavery, but the South’s insistence on not only preserving slavery but expanding it made civil war inevitable.

And they lost. Good.

Oddly enough, one of this white descendant of slaveholders' major slavery related kinks may be seen below.
 

Attachments

  • F8CCAF34-FC20-4703-B965-C74A88DBB2EC.jpeg
    F8CCAF34-FC20-4703-B965-C74A88DBB2EC.jpeg
    267.5 KB · Views: 455
  • 032579AF-B338-4CF4-B665-FE777B1CE260.jpeg
    032579AF-B338-4CF4-B665-FE777B1CE260.jpeg
    255.8 KB · Views: 447
  • 620403DD-B7E4-4205-B910-013902BD73EC.jpeg
    620403DD-B7E4-4205-B910-013902BD73EC.jpeg
    264.2 KB · Views: 435
  • 5CDF6C29-FBB3-4E68-B559-8D5B67C531B0.jpeg
    5CDF6C29-FBB3-4E68-B559-8D5B67C531B0.jpeg
    93.4 KB · Views: 466
  • D4CA5E51-D61A-4E6C-8EF7-94F72E193C1F.jpeg
    D4CA5E51-D61A-4E6C-8EF7-94F72E193C1F.jpeg
    66 KB · Views: 464
  • C02BF54E-CFF9-4A91-8FAF-7FDDA2D9DA1E.jpeg
    C02BF54E-CFF9-4A91-8FAF-7FDDA2D9DA1E.jpeg
    152.5 KB · Views: 432
  • BDEA972D-872E-4F2F-9167-362CA4329053.jpeg
    BDEA972D-872E-4F2F-9167-362CA4329053.jpeg
    159.8 KB · Views: 412
  • 53E0C1BE-D4A4-41ED-AD04-0DA3ED8B9A48.jpeg
    53E0C1BE-D4A4-41ED-AD04-0DA3ED8B9A48.jpeg
    56 KB · Views: 440
Willow, the key difference between American slavery and that of antiquity or the rest of the Americas was that manumission was not a possibility. That, and blacks by law and the Dred Scott decision could never be anything other than chattel property. Further, the Civil War wasn’t fought to end slavery, but the South’s insistence on not only preserving slavery but expanding it made civil war inevitable.

OH my love you really need to get more educated on the subject.

Manumission WAS possible and happened quite a bit.

The Dred Scott decision was that just because an owner took his slave into a non-slave state (even one where slavery was forbidden by the state constitution) did not automatically set that slave free. The gist of Scott's argument was that when he was moved to a state that forbid slavery he was automatically free because his slavery was a violation of the law. The Court ruled otherwise, that in effect, state laws do not supersede Federal laws. A legal argument that has held up pretty much ever since.

Slavery was the emotional argument that couldn't be resolved. The CAUSE of the civil war was where power resided. During the War of 1812 New England threatened to secede because they had no argument with Britain and became quite wealthy doing business with the British (see: Hartford Convention). But the Federal government (which was controlled by the south) threatened military action to prevent it. Fortunately that war ended before it came to blows.

In the 1850s the sons of the men who said New England couldn't secede were claiming that same right for themselves (yet they denied it to the voters of 6 western Virginian counties in the sate now know as West Virginia). Why? Because the population shift had caused the north to become dominant in voting and the Southern politicians could foresee a day when the industrial north, who had no use for slavery, would become tired of counting men who couldn't vote towards political apportionment and possible having to financially rescue the south.

So they tried to skedaddle so they could hang onto power.

Hmmmm ... sounds suspiciously like too many politicians around today. I'm losing power so I want to change the rules so I can retain it.

kisses

willowfall
 
Now before anybody gets the wrong idea. I completely agree with Apostate that the ending of slavery in America was a good thing.

And I will concede that given the political situation at the time, probably the only way it was going to end was thru violence.

If cooler heads had prevailed then slavery would have died a natural but much slower death as it was already economically un-viable.

But when have those in power, when threatened with the loss of their power, displayed 'cool head'?

kisses

willowfall
 
OH my love you really need to get more educated on the subject.

Manumission WAS possible and happened quite a bit.

Where? I’ve never heard of a case of manumission In the U S. I’m truly curious.
 
Back
Top Bottom