• Sign up or login, and you'll have full access to opportunities of forum.

The Cane Mutiny

Go to CruxDreams.com
“Surely a great institution like Dorsbury can’t grant tenure to a criminal who flouts the laws of our state, whether we agree with those laws or not.”
Now Dean Windar, aren´t you a bit hasty in that decision?

President Porcelli straightened up in her chair. “Dorsbury can’t afford to look narrow minded and prudish. And besides, with her, along with the rest of those up for tenure, we’ll be at 45% female tenured faculty and within sight of equality, which I assured the Board we’d reach in the next three years.”

I think we are all in agreement about how dishonest and insincere such argumentation is, right?

Now lets look at the naked (pun intended) facts:

“...someone who exposes herself on camera like some cheap porno star?”

“But what about her reaching a sexual climax on camera? She certainly didn’t put up much resistance, did she?”

His eyes were inevitably drawn to the tight little which he had so admired whenever he had seen her strolling on campus or at various faculty functions.

Dean Windar couldn’t help watching her ass as they dragged her away.

All this points are honest and certifiable.
So it comes to the point where you have to make a ethical decision. Will you decide based on lies or the truth?
Why else has ever a mere female made a career, if not supported by a genuine man?
 
An excellent story with a lot of tight little!

At that, Dean Windar rose and smiled a smile that lasted all the way back to his office, where he sat at his desk and typed an email: “Professor Moore-I have some news to share with you. Perhaps you’d care to join me for lunch at Chez Bernard. Would 12:30 be OK?”

Speaking of which -- Dean Windar appears set on checking whether that scarring is really permanent.

Not that any damage inflicted upon Barb is. :devil:
 
Excellent write-up! I think what is unique for this piece is that the offender got punished for protesting against the extreme prejudice against females, fighting for her own belief, as an academia - quite different from most genres where they got punished for obvious wrongdoings. Glad that both the authors primed the "excruciating" strokes to 23/24. I was doubting the fact that she could even go pass the 18th, but to my greatest surprise, she did so stoically! Love this short, impact and straight novel, and I like how they actually bring in the camera crew to film the her entire facial expressions and the actions and effects on her bare behind for archive. This allows me to revisit the "The Cane Mutiny". :)

Good satisfaction, and thanks!
 
Excellent write-up! I think what is unique for this piece is that the offender got punished for protesting against the extreme prejudice against females, fighting for her own belief, as an academia - quite different from most genres where they got punished for obvious wrongdoings. Glad that both the authors primed the "excruciating" strokes to 23/24. I was doubting the fact that she could even go pass the 18th, but to my greatest surprise, she did so stoically! Love this short, impact and straight novel, and I like how they actually bring in the camera crew to film the her entire facial expressions and the actions and effects on her bare behind for archive. This allows me to revisit the "The Cane Mutiny". :)

Good satisfaction, and thanks!

Thanks for the nice review. Glad you liked the story.
 
Back
Top Bottom