• Sign up or login, and you'll have full access to opportunities of forum.

Sex Slaves

Go to CruxDreams.com
Wikipedia has some discussion of manumission in the US.

From said article:

After the invention of the cotton gin in 1793, which enabled the development of extensive new areas for cotton cultivation, the number of manumissions decreased because of the increased demand for slave labor. In the 19th century, slave revolts such as the Haitian Revolution, and especially, the 1831 rebellion, led by Nat Turner, increased slaveholders' fears, and most Southern states passed laws making manumission nearly impossible until the passage of the 1865 Thirteenth Amendment to the United States Constitution, which abolished slavery "except as a punishment for crime whereof the party shall have been duly convicted," after the American Civil War. In South Carolina, to free a slave required permission of the state legislature; in Florida manumission was prohibited altogether.[35]

And I therefore stand partly corrected. I hadn’t been aware of the existence of manumission in parts of the south, although after 1831 it became almost impossible.

Thanks a bunch, Willow, for the research I was too lazy tonight to do. ;)
 
Well, you can't just confiscate someone's valuable property without compensation. That would be theft.
Like it hasn't been done by all stripes of governments. In southern Africa they call it "land redistribution". In other places it's just nationalization of assets held by former colonial powers. In other cases excuses are made for the seizure of assets. You just have to have a moral or legal justification. In the case of slavery, I suspect that the British government was balancing the growing public outrage about slavery with the need to keep the support of powerful colonial and domestic commercial support.
Willow, the key difference between American slavery and that of antiquity or the rest of the Americas was that manumission was not a possibility. That, and blacks by law and the Dred Scott decision could never be anything other than chattel property. Further, the Civil War wasn’t fought to end slavery, but the South’s insistence on not only preserving slavery but expanding it made civil war inevitable.
Yes. Slavery has always existed (more or less), but the United States was the most prominent example of slavery that was associated with a single specific race, coupled with the idea that slavery was hereditary and directly associated with that race, to the point where preachers in churches were preaching that blacks being slaves was the natural order. African slave trade was more about economics, feuds, etc. - but you were a slave because your tribe was unlucky, or you were unlucky, not solely because you were a particular race.
 
Thanks a bunch, Willow, for the research I was too lazy tonight to do. ;)

No problem Apostate. I have a head for strange things. One of the nuns in HS accused me of having the largest collection of useless trivia of anybody she had ever met.

But I'm real good at Trivial Pursuit.

And that is part of the problem. There is so much information out there it is hard to sort out the wheat from the chaff. And of course some of it is cultural. The Japanese teach a very different version of WWII than almost anybody else.

And there is so much politics around the slavery issue in America on both sides. They only feed you what they want you to believe.

kisses

willowfall
 
Last edited:
Like it hasn't been done by all stripes of governments. In southern Africa they call it "land redistribution". In other places it's just nationalization of assets held by former colonial powers. In other cases excuses are made for the seizure of assets. You just have to have a moral or legal justification. In the case of slavery, I suspect that the British government was balancing the growing public outrage about slavery with the need to keep the support of powerful colonial and domestic commercial support.

Yes. Slavery has always existed (more or less), but the United States was the most prominent example of slavery that was associated with a single specific race, coupled with the idea that slavery was hereditary and directly associated with that race, to the point where preachers in churches were preaching that blacks being slaves was the natural order. African slave trade was more about economics, feuds, etc. - but you were a slave because your tribe was unlucky, or you were unlucky, not solely because you were a particular race.
I agree. African slavery was almost a way of life. If you look at the rules for the treatment of slaves in Zanzibar and compare them to the lives of industrial workers in England at the same time, slavery almost seems a better bet.

In the late 1800's the British Government was very ambivalent about the slave trade. While publicly condemning it, they also tacitly approved of the trade in the Indian Ocean. And that trade did go both ways, with white slaves, mainly Slavs, being a luxury import into East Africa.
 

Don't think much of this one though. Nothing wrong with her, but I always think these slave showings should have a bit more style, not just in some guy's apartment living room like some cheap tupperware party. She's probably hiding her head in her hands because she thinks she's going to be sold to some guy still living in his mom's basement.:eek::confused::doh:
This however is the reality for many submissive women - himself returning with some mates from the pub. For some fun humiliating his wife. Made to strip amd show her body while they comment on her. Then satisfying half a dozen sleazy men as best she can.
 
Now before anybody gets the wrong idea. I completely agree with Apostate that the ending of slavery in America was a good thing.

And I will concede that given the political situation at the time, probably the only way it was going to end was thru violence.

If cooler heads had prevailed then slavery would have died a natural but much slower death as it was already economically un-viable.

But when have those in power, when threatened with the loss of their power, displayed 'cool head'?

kisses

willowfall
In any case it would have happened due to economic considerations.

Bottom line, an Indian road worker probably works harder in any given day than any 50 Australian road workers, but 1 Australian road worker driving a levelling/grading/asphalting/compressing road working machine for a day would probably create more road than any 500 Indian road workers in a month.

Technology obviates labour, and slavery (in the US and elsewhere) was primarily justified on the basis of the productivity of the individual slave and the costs of maintaining him or her.

In the 1860's the water/man/animal powered Cotton Gin was already obsolete and rendered uneconomic by the massively more productive and unit cost cheaper Northern States cotton mills, slaves were already being superseded by much more efficient, cheaper and more productive cotton picking machines, and the amount of money spent of housing, feeding, and otherwise caring for huddle expensive (at the time around about $1000 average per average ... not prime ... field slave - which was more than 95% of the white population earned in a year) slaves had pretty much rendered slavery something that would have died out on its own.

That said, I think that those who argue the Civil War was purely a States Rights conflict that became an Emancipation one are unreconstructed revisionists who fail to take the temperature of the times.

England and Europe had wrestled with a death with the slavery problem, but during the 1850's the US was noted for having a moral/ethical hot blooded somewhat murderous disagreement (especially on the North/South bordered states) that culminated in John Brown and some serious massacres and violence by both sides.

The North because it had industrialised and had made slavery economically irrelevant could afford to be moral and on their high horse, whilst the South, which had not, was looking at the destruction of a way of life that served only what we would call 'the 1%' today ...

It was unfortunate that the extremists on both sides carried the day and plunged the US into a disastrous Civil War that cost better than a 500,000 lives ... but on the other hand, the conflict was the final making of America as a nation.
 
In any case it would have happened due to economic considerations.

Bottom line, an Indian road worker probably works harder in any given day than any 50 Australian road workers, but 1 Australian road worker driving a levelling/grading/asphalting/compressing road working machine for a day would probably create more road than any 500 Indian road workers in a month.

Technology obviates labour, and slavery (in the US and elsewhere) was primarily justified on the basis of the productivity of the individual slave and the costs of maintaining him or her.

In the 1860's the water/man/animal powered Cotton Gin was already obsolete and rendered uneconomic by the massively more productive and unit cost cheaper Northern States cotton mills, slaves were already being superseded by much more efficient, cheaper and more productive cotton picking machines, and the amount of money spent of housing, feeding, and otherwise caring for huddle expensive (at the time around about $1000 average per average ... not prime ... field slave - which was more than 95% of the white population earned in a year) slaves had pretty much rendered slavery something that would have died out on its own.

That said, I think that those who argue the Civil War was purely a States Rights conflict that became an Emancipation one are unreconstructed revisionists who fail to take the temperature of the times.

England and Europe had wrestled with a death with the slavery problem, but during the 1850's the US was noted for having a moral/ethical hot blooded somewhat murderous disagreement (especially on the North/South bordered states) that culminated in John Brown and some serious massacres and violence by both sides.

The North because it had industrialised and had made slavery economically irrelevant could afford to be moral and on their high horse, whilst the South, which had not, was looking at the destruction of a way of life that served only what we would call 'the 1%' today ...

It was unfortunate that the extremists on both sides carried the day and plunged the US into a disastrous Civil War that cost better than a 500,000 lives ... but on the other hand, the conflict was the final making of America as a nation.
History is so interesting because time and our own changing mores often blur our perception of the facts , for which we often rely on subjective contemporary accounts. As the old saying goes, history is written by the victors.
 
An Indecent Proposal ?

kuex9iV.jpg

Suwailim el-Malik leans back in his chair and observes the multi screen before him offering hundreds of nubile white slave girls for his perusal. He is umpteenth in line for the throne but still prefers the company of a pretty sex slave to that of other royalty, politicians and other boring people. Although now advanced in years he still considers himself to be something of a stallion when it comes to his sex life. Recently however he has suffered the odd malfunction not entirely due to the quantity of Khabadami wine which is meant for export only. So, here he is at the newly opened “Rent Or Buy Me” hi tech sex slave auction house here at the magnificent coastal town of Tal Afaqin. He has selected two slaves for closer inspection and as his assistant checks their vital statistics Suwailim explains what will be required of his slaves during the next month while he decides whether to purchase or not. The girls listen how he describes in great detail how they will put on a nightly performance for him. He wants to see them go through the manual of lesbian lovemaking from A to Z finishing with pussy licking until both have an orgasm. After that they will turn their attentions to his cock and use their mouths on him. And that is just for starters. After a successful month’s trial period he would buy them.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Pay The Fine (Hosted on Bdsmlr)
bdsmlr-75293-4Vt6tjObrk.jpeg

Sunbathing topless in Khabadami can be a bit risky. It is advisable to make sure that you have a permit or at least pay an on the spot fine administered by the morality police. Here one unfortunate tourist had neither the permit or the money so she was immediately whisked off to the local station for her punishment. The police woman on the left is Fakeehah who is admiring the restraint device that she put together herself. She enjoyed playing with Meccano as a child. The other police woman is Nadia who enjoys using a whip on any female with bigger tits than herself.
 
Hello Melissa,
to say thanks for your great Arabian slave market pics:

Story of a priest in deep Africa. See what happens to his family after Arabian slave traders attacks the church...
Really enjoyed them. Great drawings. Color version
Coming?
 
Ayesha: “Are all the cafes and pubs shut?”
Huzaifa: “At least until Eid al-Adha! No footie..no camel racing. Even the Salah al-Din Arms are shut.”
Fascinatingly progressive place, this Khabadamistan.

Huzaifa: “What is CruxForums my little desert flower?”
Ayesha: “A place where Christian virgins are regularly crucified.”
Huzaifa: “Then may Allah bless that place a thousand times over.
This Ayesha might teach her husband a few things yet. He seems open to it.

Shuri: “Oh please please master can I have a French maid’s outfit? I will be a very very good slave for you.”
Sakura: “I will be very good slave also dear master..please can I have this one?”
Huzaifa takes out his wallet. His wife looks at him.
“Those two have you wrapped around their little fingers!”
Mind you, he's not doing too badly on his own, even without being a CF member himself. :D
 
Nothing satisfies more than a bit of successful entrepreneurship ;):p
Is that Hay is her twat? Oh my God ... this is making my twat cringe ... this must be what Dante was talking about in varying levels of hell. Your face is the dirt, you are beaten at will, with toothless idiots decideing between you or the goats. You are surrounded by the general rabble with an IQ of around 90, this is fun .... in HELL
 
Back
Top Bottom