• Sign up or login, and you'll have full access to opportunities of forum.

Ideal male crucifixion aesthetic?

Ideal male crucifixion aesthetic

  • #1 Stud: Masculine, Muscular, Hairy, Powerful build

    Votes: 83 44.4%
  • #2 Femboy: Feminine, Hairless, smooth, slim build (possibly long hair)

    Votes: 94 50.3%
  • #3 Heavy: Large/Obese, natural/averag look

    Votes: 23 12.3%
  • #4 Older: Lean, well maintained, experienced on the cross

    Votes: 28 15.0%
  • & Free-Hanging from cross

    Votes: 76 40.6%
  • & Sedile/Cornu

    Votes: 87 46.5%
  • & Chastity Cage

    Votes: 17 9.1%
  • & Other (post below)

    Votes: 5 2.7%

  • Total voters
    187
Go to CruxDreams.com

DarkSide808

Assistant executioner
I've noticed in the male crucifixion thread a number of user pics (along with my own), also professional modelling/porn pics, so I thought Id start a discussion/poll about what peoples favorite male aesthetic would be on the cross!

# = Common body types (i.e. I'm #2)
& = Implements/Additions

Multiple choice poll so pick your favorite combos! Feel free to share pics as well (I will upon request) or suggest additions to the poll.
 
I think since we are still more used to see nude females and heterosexual sex, we (as male) like in the male crucified scenes the unusual view of exposed males and all sexual humiliations. Tastes are different, but naturally if you are younger you look better. For example you look very good and I would like to see more of the sexual humiliation aspects with you. And there is the identification aspect looking for people crucified which are similar to you, which also holds for females. Then very important is the agony. So the faces should shows me pain. I am very much into porn videos which show faces of females in unsuspected anal penetrations or males with unsuspected bigger or painful ones. Here tastes are different and for me the cross has to have some Cornu, others say nails or other things.... Good is always some viewers, something naturally is missed in homemade pics.
 
I've noticed in the male crucifixion thread a number of user pics (along with my own), also professional modelling/porn pics, so I thought Id start a discussion/poll about what peoples favorite male aesthetic would be on the cross!

# = Common body types (i.e. I'm #2)
& = Implements/Additions

Multiple choice poll so pick your favorite combos! Feel free to share pics as well (I will upon request) or suggest additions to the poll.

Great idea to start this poll. Thanks for that!
Good to have another, different thread for male crux :)

I think however, that the poll could be extended a little bit by some additional points to choose from and maybe by a finer differentiation between the body types.
For instance, as an additional point also the type of cross and position of the victim on the cross might be of interest for males as well. It's quite a difference whether the genitalia are more or less hidden between the legs or if they are completely exposed, either because the legs are angled or spread or if an X-cross is used.
Then, should the victim wear a loincloth or should he be completely bare naked? We know there are different preferences on this as well, as can be seen in the "Male crux" thread.
Also, I personally think that the distinction between stud vs. femboy is a little but too strict. For me, being shaved or smooth does not necessarily mean "femboy type". Also masculine man can be shaved ;)

Just some suggestion! Hope you agree
 
Hm, but fat male need it more since there is more weight to support! So skinny probably without cornu. ;-)
Great idea to start this poll. Thanks for that!
Good to have another, different thread for male crux :)

I think however, that the poll could be extended a little bit by some additional points to choose from and maybe by a finer differentiation between the body types.Probably
Probably better start second poll, to big polls are confusing.
 
Also, I personally think that the distinction between stud vs. femboy is a little but too strict. For me, being shaved or smooth does not necessarily mean "femboy type". Also masculine man can be shaved ;)
True, it is more the question what a body can endure. I remember when young that there were no "fisting" videos with younger men, but now I knew some porn stars, with feminine look, being DAP'd and fisted.... 2091347306.jpg2088516810.jpg. In the scene here, it is funny to look at his surprised face (sorry no pic of that, should make one). DarkSide808 probably think, he as very nice, young one: He will get a small cornu..... he is wrong!
 
I think since we are still more used to see nude females and heterosexual sex, we (as male) like in the male crucified scenes the unusual view of exposed males and all sexual humiliations. Tastes are different, but naturally if you are younger you look better. For example you look very good and I would like to see more of the sexual humiliation aspects with you. And there is the identification aspect looking for people crucified which are similar to you, which also holds for females. Then very important is the agony. So the faces should shows me pain. I am very much into porn videos which show faces of females in unsuspected anal penetrations or males with unsuspected bigger or painful ones. Here tastes are different and for me the cross has to have some Cornu, others say nails or other things.... Good is always some viewers, something naturally is missed in homemade pics.

I see where you are coming from with sexual humiliation, which is why I put options like cornu and chastity cage, as I could see myself enduring both while crucified. Aside from the humiliation of my smooth body writhing on display, the combination of a small cage and a cornu might make me want to cum, without ever getting to do more than slowly leak. That's peak humiliation right there, denied orgasm needed from being fucked by the cornu visibly.
 
I see where you are coming from with sexual humiliation, which is why I put options like cornu and chastity cage, as I could see myself enduring both while crucified. Aside from the humiliation of my smooth body writhing on display, the combination of a small cage and a cornu might make me want to cum, without ever getting to do more than slowly leak. That's peak humiliation right there, denied orgasm needed from being fucked by the cornu visibly.
Some people naturally are humiliated when people see them having an orgasm. How is that for you? In roman times especially as male you should be impenetrable and even worser if you enjoy it. So one comes to see at crucifixion also to see how victim enjoys cornu. The second problem with cage it is some kind of protection from views and fro. possible penis torments by the guards/audiance.
 
Well I'm not into men, so I'm not really qualified to comment in this thread, but if I was forced to choose an option, I'd have to pick option 2 (obviously) :)
 
When you are not into man, then you might be happy if these ugly, hairy things are on cross?
Not really because for me it's all about the visuals. I like looking at beautiful women, not at guys. I don't dislike guys (I have lots of male friends IRL as well as in here) - I just have no sexual interest in them, but I guess I chose option 2 because the more a guy looks like a woman, the more visually interesting he is to look at :)

As a long-time connoisseur of porn, I watch all kinds of erotic material, and just because I'm a lesbian it doesn't mean that I can't watch guys in porn movies, but the ones that appeal to my sensibilities the most are the smoothly shaved ones (this applies to women as most people in here are aware) as I have an inherent dislike of body hair so although I don't find men to be sexually attractive, the smooth-shaved ones are definitely more visually appealing.

I'm not really talking about shemales or crossdressers here - that's a different thing, and in my experience, the majority of crossdressing guys still look a bit too masculine for my tastes (hairy legs in sheer stockings is not a great look), and this applies to the shemales too - very few of them look feminine enough to get me aroused (There are a handful of exceptions - Natalie Mars, Shiri Allwood and a couple of others) and also, a great many shemale pornstars are either darker-skinned (the goth-chick in me prefers really pale complexions) and/or covered in tattoos (another one of my pet hates - sadly even some of my most favourite pornstars are carrying WAY too much ink for my tastes these days)

On the other hand, I still like to see men act like men, even if they look a bit feminine - there are several shaved male pornstars who can show a girl a rough time in the bedroom or dungeon, and that's cool - Soyboys need not apply because they're not appealing to anybody - least of all the women that they simp for.

I guess the bottom line if that if I have to look at a naked man, then I'd prefer to look at one who looks a bit more feminine I guess (Sorry if I'm not making much sense here - I do tend to ramble a bit at times :)
 
I guess the bottom line if that if I have to look at a naked man, then I'd prefer to look at one who looks a bit more feminine I guess (Sorry if I'm not making much sense here - I do tend to ramble a bit at times :)
Thanks for the long answer, so you enjoy the look and not the fact that someone is crucified, how nice :jump1: Well there are people loving to see "bearish" people, mostly males I guess. I remember once at a naturism place someone complaining, that I lost weight..... I once joked about a travesty star who had a very good show, that this proves that males are even the better females. And yes we have not so many TV/Trans people on cross, DarkSide808 here and there was another one who had very impressive pics, but yes she still looked a little manly. I think there are different aspects of male vs female crucifixions, first the most important crucifixion for many people is of a male and secondly for us males naturally we want to protect the poor helpless females, probably we should ask about ideal female crucifixions to.
 
Thanks for the long answer, so you enjoy the look and not the fact that someone is crucified, how nice :jump1: Well there are people loving to see "bearish" people, mostly males I guess. I remember once at a naturism place someone complaining, that I lost weight..... I once joked about a travesty star who had a very good show, that this proves that males are even the better females. And yes we have not so many TV/Trans people on cross, DarkSide808 here and there was another one who had very impressive pics, but yes she still looked a little manly. I think there are different aspects of male vs female crucifixions, first the most important crucifixion for many people is of a male and secondly for us males naturally we want to protect the poor helpless females, probably we should ask about ideal female crucifixions to.
Yeah i'm not really into crux itself as much as many are in here - for me I enjoy the more general BDSM aspect of this site but of course crux has its part to play in that too :)

The best thing about this site is that it has something for everybody, no matter what their particular tastes are, and that's what makes this friendly and welcoming community so amazing :)
 
Im in the same boat here... Im pansexual I guess, I love the aesthetic of a beautiful girl struggling on the cross, whereas I only find a masculine guy attractive in a dominant position. Im submissive sexually, and so happen to have a naturally feminine appearance, so just the idea of seeing myself crucified, let alone experiencing it, is hot to me.

But I personally don't care for too much mixing of the masculine/feminine roles... masculine x femboy is hot but not masc x masc (the majority of gay porn). Interesting to see someone else with the same perspective.

Not really because for me it's all about the visuals. I like looking at beautiful women, not at guys. I don't dislike guys (I have lots of male friends IRL as well as in here) - I just have no sexual interest in them, but I guess I chose option 2 because the more a guy looks like a woman, the more visually interesting he is to look at :)

As a long-time connoisseur of porn, I watch all kinds of erotic material, and just because I'm a lesbian it doesn't mean that I can't watch guys in porn movies, but the ones that appeal to my sensibilities the most are the smoothly shaved ones (this applies to women as most people in here are aware) as I have an inherent dislike of body hair so although I don't find men to be sexually attractive, the smooth-shaved ones are definitely more visually appealing.

I'm not really talking about shemales or crossdressers here - that's a different thing, and in my experience, the majority of crossdressing guys still look a bit too masculine for my tastes (hairy legs in sheer stockings is not a great look), and this applies to the shemales too - very few of them look feminine enough to get me aroused (There are a handful of exceptions - Natalie Mars, Shiri Allwood and a couple of others) and also, a great many shemale pornstars are either darker-skinned (the goth-chick in me prefers really pale complexions) and/or covered in tattoos (another one of my pet hates - sadly even some of my most favourite pornstars are carrying WAY too much ink for my tastes these days)

On the other hand, I still like to see men act like men, even if they look a bit feminine - there are several shaved male pornstars who can show a girl a rough time in the bedroom or dungeon, and that's cool - Soyboys need not apply because they're not appealing to anybody - least of all the women that they simp for.

I guess the bottom line if that if I have to look at a naked man, then I'd prefer to look at one who looks a bit more feminine I guess (Sorry if I'm not making much sense here - I do tend to ramble a bit at times :)
 
For most of us here the attraction has to be of an erotic nature, so whoever is hanging on a cross must fit in a lot with our sexual preferences - maybe as diverse as the lot of us.
But I think being part of a crowd witnessing a crucifixion must have been a lot more complex than just fantasising about the naked victim. Executions have always been popular, at Tyburn thousands went to watch the hangings, tiers of seats were there for the paying members of the audience, it seems that watching people being put to death is a psychological attraction. Now I think we get that satisfaction from movies with the added reassurance that it is not real, but maybe we haven't changed much, a terrible road accident always encourages many to slow down to get a good look & even take photos on our cell phones.

As well as that nakedness is always fascinating, just to see what other people look like with no clothes on must bring into play all manner of responses; whether the person is sexually attractive or not is the primary one. But there is also a desire to compare within the sexes, in the sports changing rooms us men check out how we match up to other naked men, it's the competitive urge. So naked men do have an interest level to other heterosexual men that has nothing to do with sexual attraction; it's probably as basic as to how large or small the other man's penis is.

Then there has to be the interest of disgust, this must be similarly linked to our desire now to be horrified watching some films, from the safety of our distance we can relish unpleasantness with the security that it is happening to someone else. I would be sure that most of us would be repulsed by horrible examples of the opposite sex, yet that repulsion fascinates us; from the safety of a crowd we can join in with the mockery & expressions of disgust that must have dominated the atmosphere at a crucifixion - & one can be swept into joining in with the mood of a crowd very easily.

Us men do unfortunately have rather comical anatomy, we are not smooth & slinky like young females, we have vulnerable dangling bits that jerk or swing about as we move, things that would add tremendous ridicule to us males being crucified, it's as if we are designed to be humiliated by our nakedness. If, & I don't know of the likelihood of it happening, we would suffer involuntary erections whilst crucified the shame of our anatomy, so brutally exposed to the full view of many people, would be total. This cruel Roman way of executing malefactors took this into account, if one is crucified one is intended to be the object of disgust & ridicule.
 
This cruel Roman way of executing malefactors took this into account, if one is crucified one is intended to be the object of disgust & ridicule.
All correct and we must also additionally add the mind set of romans which is completely different than ours- Most of us will see nude bodies differently than the romans and also our attitude to sex is quite different. For example we would (not all) dislike male-male sex, while the romans did not, they didn't want to be on the passive side. So we would probably like to see other type of crucifixions.
 
Us men do unfortunately have rather comical anatomy, we are not smooth & slinky like young females, we have vulnerable dangling bits that jerk or swing about as we move, things that would add tremendous ridicule to us males being crucified, it's as if we are designed to be humiliated by our nakedness. If, & I don't know of the likelihood of it happening, we would suffer involuntary erections whilst crucified the shame of our anatomy, so brutally exposed to the full view of many people, would be total. This cruel Roman way of executing malefactors took this into account, if one is crucified one is intended to be the object of disgust & ridicule.

Speak for yourself, I am pretty smooth and slinky! XD

Great post though. My cock is very small so perhaps my humiliation would make other men feel good about themselves.
 
Back
Top Bottom