• Sign up or login, and you'll have full access to opportunities of forum.

Fit, Lovely Ladies Crucified

Go to CruxDreams.com
Baracus said:
Out now...is,Alex Bald's "Crucifixion 47"....
Sadly I can't show any preview pics,as such,but it looks quite promising,a nicely loinclothed girl,wriggling on her cross...:)
No idea what else the video entails,but it's around 30 mins,only available from C4S.
Click to expand...
Thanks, Baracus!

I've copied the promo gif and vid from C4S for our enjoyment here.
Click on the gif to activate.

generated_24709587.gif

https://imgur.com/a/mYnEtjL
 
poem21045 said:
I don't know if there's any narrative to this vid. I'm only passing on the promo pics and clip. I doubt that I'll purchase this one. I think Alex is straying from the purist versions of crucifixion into a bdsm zone. Hopefully, he'll find his way back.

View attachment 985114View attachment 985115View attachment 985116View attachment 985117View attachment 985118View attachment 985119View attachment 985120
https://imgur.com/a/ysgw7N1
Click to expand...
On the contrary, I think I'm buying this one. The contrast between the one with the loincloth and the poor fully nude convict looks exciting. Also, you can imagine the nude one as a brave political rebel cruelly denied her last chance of agitating from the cross.

Keep in mind, there are many of us with many shades. What is dull for one can be exhilarating for the next.
 
TomiRex said:
On the contrary, I think I'm buying this one. The contrast between the one with the loincloth and the poor fully nude convict looks exciting. Also, you can imagine the nude one as a brave political rebel cruelly denied her last chance of agitating from the cross.

Keep in mind, there are many of us with many shades. What is dull for one can be exhilarating for the next.
Click to expand...
So, I did buy it. If you buy it, you get another definitive cruxlearning lesson. Scripted (or not, but almost certainly scripted), at 12 min into the video the lithe, but solidly built model, after a jolt, hangs solely from her outstretched arms (ie. wrists), unsupported by her legs, then briefly finds some support, then hangs again without it.

According to much of the well-meaning analysis that often informed esthetics and criticism of artwork on this community, with her arms at this angle from the horizontal, her shoulders would have almost immediately disclocated, with unbearable pain to follow. Yet she doesn't even seem to be in too severe a distress.
 
TomiRex said:
So, I did buy it. If you buy it, you get another definitive cruxlearning lesson. Scripted (or not, but almost certainly scripted), at 12 min into the video the lithe, but solidly built model, after a jolt, hangs solely from her outstretched arms (ie. wrists), unsupported by her legs, then briefly finds some support, then hangs again without it.

According to much of the well-meaning analysis that often informed esthetics and criticism of artwork on this community, with her arms at this angle from the horizontal, her shoulders would have almost immediately disclocated, with unbearable pain to follow. Yet she doesn't even seem to be in too severe a distress.
Click to expand...
So, you feel this is faked? (Not that a LOT of what we like here isn't, but I just wanted to clarify.)
 
poem21045 said:
So, you feel this is faked? (Not that a LOT of what we like here isn't, but I just wanted to clarify.)
Click to expand...
What do you mean faked? It is real, but agreed with the model, acted and scripted, as any responsible producer of quality content for this community should operate.

The thing that was and is wrong was the analysis, combined with some misapplied ''physics'', that crucifixion with arms outstretched on the patibulum and less than 45 degrees up from the horizontal leads to immediate dislocation of the shoulders, and a quick and ugly suffocation. It was almost an article of faith here and @cruxfoundation in the naughts, here for example we have apostate laying down the law as it then seemed to be. It was then considered ''more realistic''.

As it turns out, a ''naked woman in the traditional pose of Christ'' from Apostate's last sentence isn't any more a fantasy than the unfounded hypothesis above.
 
poem21045 said:
Could be! If so, she's let her hair down, literally. (Sexier that way, IMO.)

On the other hand, a lot of these gals look alike: two breasts, one pussy, sweat, etc. Perhaps we should ask them to wear an identifying pin or brooch (ouchie!). . .
Click to expand...
Or get Alex to put their name,on a Titlus ?? ;) ;)
 
TomiRex said:
What do you mean faked? It is real, but agreed with the model, acted and scripted, as any responsible producer of quality content for this community should operate.

The thing that was and is wrong was the analysis, combined with some misapplied ''physics'', that crucifixion with arms outstretched on the patibulum and less than 45 degrees up from the horizontal leads to immediate dislocation of the shoulders, and a quick and ugly suffocation. It was almost an article of faith here and @cruxfoundation in the naughts, here for example we have apostate laying down the law as it then seemed to be. It was then considered ''more realistic''.

As it turns out, a ''naked woman in the traditional pose of Christ'' from Apostate's last sentence isn't any more a fantasy than the unfounded hypothesis above.
Click to expand...
Oh, I agree (mostly), T-Rex. These are women who are positioned on crosses, but that is the extent of actual crucifixion.

I was pointing out, as you say, that these ladies are actors. Nobody is really getting crucified, even without the nails. Some of them act quite well, which may lead us not only to fantasize that it's real, but for some of us actually to believe that they are suffering intense pain (I don't believe that is ever the case--at least, I hope not!). But if you look at enough crux scenes, you'll find some where the model is just a poor actor (see below). And then there are outtakes from Makar, Ramon, and others that show the models having a laugh or two while on the cross.

That's all I meant by "faked." I didn't mean CGI or anything. :rolleye:

https://imgur.com/a/2F9hAT3
 
TomiRex said:
The thing that was and is wrong was [that] crucifixion with arms outstretched on the patibulum and less than 45 degrees up from the horizontal leads to immediate dislocation of the shoulders. . . .
Click to expand...
To illustrate TR's point, here's an old Kristen clip with her arms at about 55 degrees. (I couldn't find a 45 degree vid.) After the support is taken away from her feet, she doesn't seem to be suffering all that much. Of course, she's what I would call a Timex Crux Girl: she takes a licking' but keeps on ticking'. (If you're younger than 50, you may not get this.)

https://imgur.com/a/eVS4x91
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top Bottom