• Sign up or login, and you'll have full access to opportunities of forum.

Bare-Naked (Famous) Ladies

Go to CruxDreams.com
Kim Thomson
 

Attachments

  • thomson-stealing-n-03.jpg
    thomson-stealing-n-03.jpg
    34.8 KB · Views: 255
  • thomson-stealing-n-08.jpg
    thomson-stealing-n-08.jpg
    54.6 KB · Views: 166
  • thomson-stealing-n-07.jpg
    thomson-stealing-n-07.jpg
    54.9 KB · Views: 146
  • thomson-stealing-n-06.jpg
    thomson-stealing-n-06.jpg
    51.2 KB · Views: 135
  • thomson-stealing-n-05.jpg
    thomson-stealing-n-05.jpg
    33.5 KB · Views: 123
  • thomson-stealing-n-04.jpg
    thomson-stealing-n-04.jpg
    38.7 KB · Views: 137
OK at some point, somebody has to do this...

Let's talk about Madonna's new NFT project. In this, we have Madge referring to herself as "the mother of creation", and distributing cgi images of herself giving birth to a tree...

FSWm9-NacAEEuDG.jpegScreen Shot 2022-05-11 at 2.57.47 PM.png1652281340_madonna-nft-00-750x375.jpegNINTCHDBPICT000732226289.jpeg0205d2b4-ef8d-49b2-9ddd-9e1558ea3dc7_400_297.jpegMother-of-Nature.pngmadonna-nft-12-1.jpegBB-MADONNA-NFT-COMP-1.jpeg1324322.jpegdownload.png

And there's video;

Now there's a bunch of problems going on here, starting with the big one - this does not look like Madonna!
OK, I know from my own experience that it's incredibly tough to get a good likeness in CGI - but these are professionals doing this stuff, most likely using high-end hardware and software, not a casual amateur like me using Daz3D! Come on guys - these images are being put out there as NFTs, presumably for insanely large amounts of money, yet this does not even look like who it's supposed to be!

Now don't get me wrong - these pics are gorgeous - they're interesting, beautiful and definitely weird enough to attract my attention, and I love the look and concept of them - it's all very environmental scifi - like Silent Running but with naked women (Now that's a movie I'd like to see made) - but this is still not Madonna...

If she is serious about this stuff then quite obviously she should use real photos of herself and get those highly-paid CGI gurus to add in the other stuff - at least then it would look like her! After all, if you're going to be purchasing (conned into buying) a supposedly unique NFT, then surely you want the real thing, not a poor CGI imitation...



OK, now let's get onto the real elephant in the room - the concept of NFTs themselves...

Now I'm probably too old to understand this stuff - it all seems like some sort of hyped-up ponzi scheme to me, but perhaps there is some younger individual in here who could explain this stuff properly, in a way that those of us too mature to live our lives on tiktok can understand, and possibly even try to convince me that NFTs are anything other than a scam...

Now I don't pretend to understand the nuances of this stuff, but from what little I can actually get my head around, you are basically selling an image for a large amount of money, on the basis that it is totally unique, and can never be transferred to another person, so only the buyer will ever be able to own it

EXCEPT THAT THESE IMAGES ARE ON THE INTERNET AND HALF THE PLANET HAS ALREADY DOWNLOADED THEM

Including myself of course :)

No, I just don't get it sorry...

On the plus side, it appears that Madonna actually got her vagina 3D scanned in high resolution for this project - I just hope that somebody will upload the actual 3D file for this, then I could 3D print it - and then I could have Madonna's quim hanging on the wall :D

Seriously though, I can't get away from the feeling that this whole NFT thing is just a sophisticated scam to get gullible social media poisonalities to part with their money - if it sounds like a scam, looks like a scam and works like a scam, then there's a very strong possibility that it is just a scam...

So is there anyone out there who can explain this stuff?

Am I just misunderstanding this whole thing?

Or is it really just another yuppie millennial get rich quick scam?
 
OK at some point, somebody has to do this...

Let's talk about Madonna giving birth to a tree...

View attachment 1172092View attachment 1172093View attachment 1172094View attachment 1172095View attachment 1172096View attachment 1172097View attachment 1172098View attachment 1172099View attachment 1172100View attachment 1172101

And there's video;

Now there's a bunch of problems going on here, starting with the big one - this does not look like Madonna!
OK, I know from my own experience that it's incredibly tough to get a good likeness in CGI - but these are professionals doing this stuff, most likely using high-end hardware and software, not a casual amateur like me using Daz3D! Come on guys - these images are being put out there as NFTs, presumably for insanely large amounts of money, yet this does not even look like who it's supposed to be!

Now don't get me wrong - these pics are gorgeous - they're interesting, beautiful and definitely weird enough to attract my attention, and I love the look and concept of them - it's all very environmental scifi - like Silent Running but with naked women (Now that's a movie I'd like to see made) - but this is still not Madonna...

If she is serious about this stuff then quite obviously she should use real photos of herself and get those highly-paid CGI gurus to add in the other stuff - at least then it would look like her! After all, if you're going to be purchasing (conned into buying) a supposedly unique NFT, then surely you want the real thing, not a poor CGI imitation...



OK, now let's get onto the real elephant in the room - the concept of NFTs themselves...

Now I'm probably too old to understand this stuff - it all seems like some sort of hyped-up ponzi scheme to me, but perhaps there is some younger individual in here who could explain this stuff properly, in a way that those of us too mature to live our lives on tiktok can understand, and possibly even try to convince me that NFTs are anything other than a scam...

Now I don't pretend to understand the nuances of this stuff, but from what little I can actually get my head around, you are basically selling an image for a large amount of money, on the basis that it is totally unique, and can never be transferred to another person, so only the buyer will ever be able to own it

EXCEPT THAT THESE IMAGES ARE ON THE INTERNET AND HALF THE PLANET HAS ALREADY DOWNLOADED THEM

Including myself of course :)

No, I just don't get it sorry...

On the plus side, it appears that Madonna actually got her vagina 3D scanned in high resolution for this project - I just hope that somebody will upload the actual 3D file for this, then I could 3D print it - and then I could have Madonna's quim hanging on the wall :D

Seriously though, I can't get away from the feeling that this whole NFT thing is just a sophisticated scam to get gullible social media poisonalities to part with their money - if it sounds like a scam, looks like a scam and works like a scam, then there's a very strong possibility that it is just a scam...

So is there anyone out there who can explain this stuff?

Am I just misunderstanding this whole thing?

Or is it really just another yuppie millennial get rich quick scam?
So THAT'S where Tree came from!
 
I haven't seen Madonna since MTV quit showing videos 24/7... wasn't their first video "Video killed the radio show"?
Yeah it was. Video KIlled The Radio Star by The Buggles, and it was a No.1 chart hit here in the UK way back in 1979
Ahh those were the days - when MTV actually played music...
 
Nicky Whelan
 

Attachments

  • hall-whelan-n-hd-03.jpg
    hall-whelan-n-hd-03.jpg
    41.1 KB · Views: 85
  • hall-whelan-n-hd-06.jpg
    hall-whelan-n-hd-06.jpg
    41.3 KB · Views: 88
  • hall-whelan-n-hd-07.jpg
    hall-whelan-n-hd-07.jpg
    41.8 KB · Views: 83
  • nicky_whelan_a7acb3.jpg
    nicky_whelan_a7acb3.jpg
    66 KB · Views: 79
  • nicky_whelan_3834cb.jpg
    nicky_whelan_3834cb.jpg
    66.8 KB · Views: 82
  • nicky_whelan_06e1cd.jpg
    nicky_whelan_06e1cd.jpg
    111.9 KB · Views: 80
  • nicky_whelan_d3dbf6.jpg
    nicky_whelan_d3dbf6.jpg
    70.3 KB · Views: 84
  • nicky_whelan_eb0160.jpg
    nicky_whelan_eb0160.jpg
    63.9 KB · Views: 91
  • nicky_whelan_f0248d.jpg
    nicky_whelan_f0248d.jpg
    60.4 KB · Views: 91
  • Whelan-Satisfaction_777799.jpg
    Whelan-Satisfaction_777799.jpg
    105.5 KB · Views: 112
Gina Gershon 1
 

Attachments

  • Gershon-Sweet-Revenge_732587.jpg
    Gershon-Sweet-Revenge_732587.jpg
    162.2 KB · Views: 96
  • gina_gershon_cdc8f6.jpg
    gina_gershon_cdc8f6.jpg
    199.4 KB · Views: 102
  • GinaGershon-KillerJoe-HD1.jpg
    GinaGershon-KillerJoe-HD1.jpg
    56.6 KB · Views: 95
  • GinaGershon-KillerJoe-HD3.jpg
    GinaGershon-KillerJoe-HD3.jpg
    73.7 KB · Views: 88
  • Gershon-Sweet-Revenge_732586.jpg
    Gershon-Sweet-Revenge_732586.jpg
    145.8 KB · Views: 96
  • Gershon-Sweet-Revenge_732585.jpg
    Gershon-Sweet-Revenge_732585.jpg
    179.1 KB · Views: 95
  • Gershon-Sweet-Revenge_732584.jpg
    Gershon-Sweet-Revenge_732584.jpg
    174.2 KB · Views: 87
  • gershon-bound-s-4.jpg
    gershon-bound-s-4.jpg
    24.4 KB · Views: 87
  • Gershon-Bound-HD-n-03.jpg
    Gershon-Bound-HD-n-03.jpg
    59.4 KB · Views: 87
  • Gershon-Black-n-04.jpg
    Gershon-Black-n-04.jpg
    41.9 KB · Views: 83
Gina Gershon 2
 

Attachments

  • GinaGershon-KillerJoe-HD5.jpg
    GinaGershon-KillerJoe-HD5.jpg
    38 KB · Views: 84
  • GinaGershon-KillerJoe-HD9.jpg
    GinaGershon-KillerJoe-HD9.jpg
    59.2 KB · Views: 87
  • GinaGershon-KillerJoe-HD11.jpg
    GinaGershon-KillerJoe-HD11.jpg
    67.6 KB · Views: 93
  • ShowGirls-Gershon-5.jpg
    ShowGirls-Gershon-5.jpg
    80.8 KB · Views: 83
  • ShowGirls-Gershon-2.jpg
    ShowGirls-Gershon-2.jpg
    81.6 KB · Views: 85
  • ShowGirls-Gershon-7.jpg
    ShowGirls-Gershon-7.jpg
    102.9 KB · Views: 86
  • ShowGirls-Gershon-9.jpg
    ShowGirls-Gershon-9.jpg
    112.6 KB · Views: 84
  • ShowGirls-Gershon-10.jpg
    ShowGirls-Gershon-10.jpg
    119.9 KB · Views: 95
  • ShowGirls-Gershon-12.jpg
    ShowGirls-Gershon-12.jpg
    105.3 KB · Views: 132
  • ShowGirls-Gershon-11.jpg
    ShowGirls-Gershon-11.jpg
    82.1 KB · Views: 110
I'm reposting a gif of Britt Ekland's body double's frankly remarkable ass from "The Wicker Man," because it is my pleasure to do so. :babeando: :very_hot:

54CCFA30-EC50-4631-AEEE-C654A5051A70.gif
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Watching X-men; Dark Phoenix, in which Jessica Chastain plays a blonde, shapeshifting alien,

25C066FC-26D4-48C0-8D0B-6D748C18511B.gif

but I much prefer her human form as a naural redhead. :babeando:

6436D655-1F37-4829-B813-FDB192018F75.gif500B0CFF-8805-4F4E-B505-A73BA47B75DA.gifC416F09B-93F5-4657-AE58-50900BEE9322.gifA923E58A-BC15-4052-A9E5-B60C4CF02155.gif29AE2AF1-0C65-4969-B8E6-358C4565D966.gifB8517147-E3F4-4ED4-B080-1CEAE1F3E4E7.gif
 
Michele Little
 

Attachments

  • Little-Sweet-Revenge_732588.jpg
    Little-Sweet-Revenge_732588.jpg
    182.1 KB · Views: 68
  • Little-Sweet-Revenge_732589.jpg
    Little-Sweet-Revenge_732589.jpg
    120 KB · Views: 66
  • Little-Sweet-Revenge_732590.jpg
    Little-Sweet-Revenge_732590.jpg
    129.9 KB · Views: 70
  • Little-Sweet-Revenge_732591.jpg
    Little-Sweet-Revenge_732591.jpg
    125.1 KB · Views: 69
Sonya Cullingford
 

Attachments

  • sonya_cullingford_3b4671.jpg
    sonya_cullingford_3b4671.jpg
    151.5 KB · Views: 73
  • sonya_cullingford_a1dfbd.jpg
    sonya_cullingford_a1dfbd.jpg
    146.8 KB · Views: 63
  • sonya_cullingford_697831.jpg
    sonya_cullingford_697831.jpg
    107.7 KB · Views: 60
  • sonya_cullingford_63dc2e.jpg
    sonya_cullingford_63dc2e.jpg
    107.9 KB · Views: 62
  • sonya_cullingford_c7eaa9.jpg
    sonya_cullingford_c7eaa9.jpg
    41.9 KB · Views: 62
  • sonya_cullingford_f0f274.jpg
    sonya_cullingford_f0f274.jpg
    97.4 KB · Views: 87
So many famous nude ladies.... I wonder, if it would not be more easy to post only those who were never nude on pics, such as such as.... hm, probably a waste to study longer....
Dig, if you’re talking about deepfakes, there terabytes of them out there, but they go against this thread’s purpose, and personally I’ve never had any use for them.

With the possible exception of Natalie Wood in the 1962 film "Gypsy," wherein she played a stripper but never even once got naked. :rolleyes:

72E8BA6D-A7A8-4EEE-BED4-2DC77667936E.jpeg
 
Dig, if you’re talking about deepfakes, there terabytes of them out there, but they go against this thread’s purpose, and personally I’ve never had any use for them.

Will the possible exception of Natalie Wood in the 1962 film "Gypsy," wherein she played a stripper but never even once got naked. :rolleyes:

View attachment 1174598
Actually even considering the not fakes there are relatively few. Some, where it was rumoured that they are in real male are under them. In that sense, I think as celebrity you should do nude pics (I would), it seems more natural and healthy. Sadly the good payments of playboy has broken away.
 
Back
Top Bottom