• Sign up or login, and you'll have full access to opportunities of forum.

Bare-Naked (Famous) Ladies

Go to CruxDreams.com
First attempt here;

Quite a bit of work to do still (Particularly getting the face just right - sadly I have to use Facegen Artist Pro for this which is not that great, but I have never been able to get Headshop to run on my system). Couldn't find any mention of her height online, so I've just made her 5'6" (1.67m) tall for this early test. I still need to do a bit more shaping on her breasts, hips and legs but overall I think she's not looking too bad so far :)
Ethel Warwick WiP test render 001.jpg
I didn't have the exact hairstyle for her so this is about the closest but since this was made for an old Poser character, I didn't have a Daz-compatible MAT file so I had to tweak the hair colour by hand with less than optimal results. I'll see if I can do a bit better for my next attempt.
 
First attempt here;

Quite a bit of work to do still (Particularly getting the face just right - sadly I have to use Facegen Artist Pro for this which is not that great, but I have never been able to get Headshop to run on my system). Couldn't find any mention of her height online, so I've just made her 5'6" (1.67m) tall for this early test. I still need to do a bit more shaping on her breasts, hips and legs but overall I think she's not looking too bad so far :)
View attachment 986393
I didn't have the exact hairstyle for her so this is about the closest but since this was made for an old Poser character, I didn't have a Daz-compatible MAT file so I had to tweak the hair colour by hand with less than optimal results. I'll see if I can do a bit better for my next attempt.
A quick search came up dry on Ms. Warwick's height, but your guesstimate will definitely do.

But Princess . . . she looks kinda scary. By design?

67081C98-D30D-4BD8-A6C6-177EE666F9EC.jpeg
 
First attempt here;

Quite a bit of work to do still (Particularly getting the face just right - sadly I have to use Facegen Artist Pro for this which is not that great, but I have never been able to get Headshop to run on my system). Couldn't find any mention of her height online, so I've just made her 5'6" (1.67m) tall for this early test. I still need to do a bit more shaping on her breasts, hips and legs but overall I think she's not looking too bad so far :)
View attachment 986393
I didn't have the exact hairstyle for her so this is about the closest but since this was made for an old Poser character, I didn't have a Daz-compatible MAT file so I had to tweak the hair colour by hand with less than optimal results. I'll see if I can do a bit better for my next attempt.
That's nice work, Princess! I wonder if her head is not just a touch too large though. It might be the perspective, I suppose. Body shape seems right, if the photos/paintings of her are accurate.
 
But Princess . . . she looks kinda scary. By design?

View attachment 986394
Sadly not - this is a result of Facegen Artist Pro not mapping the source image onto the model very well. The source image was this one (The best quality colour one I could find);
a6b954da7c2f6dd315e2fb50d7f01a5e.jpeg
But as usual, Facegen made a right mess of it. I guess I'll have to do it the hard way to get a half-decent likeness that doesn't look posessed :)

I've probably made her too tall though, as most people from that era were much smaller than today's average - Louise was 5'1" and Clara was 5'2" for example (Even though Louise always looks taller)
 
More on Ethel Warwick. Apparently she starred in a production of Ben Hur in 1902 (I don't recall a scene in which one of the female characters is romanced by a Roman, but these early publicity shots may not have had much to do with the actual play or film, except to show the actors). Anyway, appearing with a Roman sort of makes her "one of us", I think (posthumously, I suppose).
EthelWarwick03.jpeg
 
Princess, you and others might find this


of interest. ;)
 
Princess, you and others might find this


of interest. ;)
A fascinating article - a good find, thank you :)
 
Sympazero, last week you cited Barbara Stanwyck's bare back as an example of too much skin inflaming a certain type of man, like that’s a bad thing. :rolleyes:

Then you’ll be happy or alarmed to know there’s a plethora of pics of her in the nude, dating back to one of her early gigs as a Ziegfeld Girl. ;):very_hot:
The last four, in the group that starts with Barbara Stanwyck, are one of the Gish sisters. I think it's Lillian, but I haven't seen them enough to tell them apart. I know some folks here may disagree, and I respect your take on this, but as much as I enjoy looking at naked beauties, the thought that they might have been unwilling to pose, but were forced to, bothers me quite a lot. That's just my feeling. I react the same way when I see whipping vids that look too real.
 
The last four, in the group that starts with Barbara Stanwyck, are one of the Gish sisters. I think it's Lillian, but I haven't seen them enough to tell them apart.
Whipmaster, I fell in lust with Lillian Gish as a teenager, and from everything I’ve been able to learn she was, onscreen and off, a perpetual virgin. Consequently for a quarter century of online searching I have not been able to find even fake photos of Miss Lillian in the nude.

By which I mean if you find any, post them immediately! ;)
 

Attachments

  • 2C63388A-43B8-4FF9-AA6B-510B89B5C4D0.gif
    2C63388A-43B8-4FF9-AA6B-510B89B5C4D0.gif
    19.4 KB · Views: 89
The Hayley Mills looks fake. The head looks just a tad too big for the body.
Oh, and that Hayley Mills pic is all kinds of fake. At least people do make fakes of her. :rolleyes:
 

Attachments

  • 0BE67AA5-72C6-4E14-966C-AA07DA1B5E40.jpeg
    0BE67AA5-72C6-4E14-966C-AA07DA1B5E40.jpeg
    77.8 KB · Views: 109
Earlier this evening I watched "Friday’s Child"


for the first time since the Reagan administration, and was reminded about how much fun Julie Newmar must have had making it

094C0385-F460-43FB-A881-58E2BBFA4C2D.gif

and of how many unfaked photos of her naked there are, many or all of which have already appeared on this thread. ;) :babeando:
 

Attachments

  • BD4D8AF3-C7F0-4AF1-B330-685B7109DE13.jpeg
    BD4D8AF3-C7F0-4AF1-B330-685B7109DE13.jpeg
    61.4 KB · Views: 107
  • ABE5BEEB-5FAD-4A2B-AAB4-4E784706C09E.jpeg
    ABE5BEEB-5FAD-4A2B-AAB4-4E784706C09E.jpeg
    126.7 KB · Views: 114
  • 0AA8960D-C554-4B6E-B967-D65E42C43BFF.jpeg
    0AA8960D-C554-4B6E-B967-D65E42C43BFF.jpeg
    110.3 KB · Views: 115
  • A52C9083-BF4A-45DA-A3AF-3C83BE1CC9DB.jpeg
    A52C9083-BF4A-45DA-A3AF-3C83BE1CC9DB.jpeg
    66.6 KB · Views: 107
  • 6718455C-D74A-49B4-AD51-8510026372F2.jpeg
    6718455C-D74A-49B4-AD51-8510026372F2.jpeg
    51.5 KB · Views: 104
  • 5FC9772D-F421-46F9-B7CF-A6949B331818.jpeg
    5FC9772D-F421-46F9-B7CF-A6949B331818.jpeg
    160.6 KB · Views: 100
  • 7AD02A66-5A63-4AA5-8AC6-D296838C5200.jpeg
    7AD02A66-5A63-4AA5-8AC6-D296838C5200.jpeg
    140.6 KB · Views: 124
Whipmaster, I fell in lust with Lillian Gish as a teenager, and from everything I’ve been able to learn she was, onscreen and off, a perpetual virgin. Consequently for a quarter century of online searching I have not been able to find even fake photos of Miss Lillian in the nude.

By which I mean if you find any, post them immediately! ;)
Challenge Accepted - even virgins are not immune from being perverted by CGI - And so, another silent era beauty gets added to the list :p
 
Back
Top Bottom