which may have been the actual cause of death when people were burnt at the stake,View attachment 921704 This is rather 'suffocated at the stake'!
But even when someone got a nice good blaze going, the fire itself would have (as I understand it) caused a lack of oxygen for breathing, and/or superheated the air around the victim so that the likely effect would have been some sort of asphyxiation due to heat overpowering the lungs, and the person would expire long before they were entirely burned (which is not to say that there wouldn't have been some burning around the feet and legs especially, as the fire really got going). I know this is all fantasy speculation here, but back in the day I'm not sure I would have been one to frequent these spectacles.which may have been the actual cause of death when people were burnt at the stake,
in most of Europe, wood needs drying off before it makes a blaze,
for executions, damp wood would have sufficed, slow burning made for a slower death,
and more likely by suffocation, dehydration etc. rather than high-temperature burning.
What a delightful discussion. Not that I am complaining!But even when someone got a nice good blaze going, the fire itself would have (as I understand it) caused a lack of oxygen for breathing, and/or superheated the air around the victim so that the likely effect would have been some sort of asphyxiation due to heat overpowering the lungs, and the person would expire long before they were entirely burned (which is not to say that there wouldn't have been some burning around the feet and legs especially, as the fire really got going). I know this is all fantasy speculation here, but back in the day I'm not sure I would have been one to frequent these spectacles.
Not at all fantasy. There are people who have carried out experiments about that (with dummy condemned of course). Measurements of temperature and analysis of the air confirm the deadly impact of hot, toxic air within a few minutes; long before burning itself would kill.But even when someone got a nice good blaze going, the fire itself would have (as I understand it) caused a lack of oxygen for breathing, and/or superheated the air around the victim so that the likely effect would have been some sort of asphyxiation due to heat overpowering the lungs, and the person would expire long before they were entirely burned (which is not to say that there wouldn't have been some burning around the feet and legs especially, as the fire really got going). I know this is all fantasy speculation here, but back in the day I'm not sure I would have been one to frequent these spectacles.
I agree that part is not fantasy. The bit about being interested and/or excited/aroused by BATS is fantasy, at least for me it is.Not at all fantasy. There are people who have carried out experiments about that (with dummy condemned of course). Measurements of temperature and analysis of the air confirm the deadly impact of hot, toxic air within a few minutes; long before burning itself would kill.
Yes, I'm sure firefighters need to understand the medical science, and there will have been plenty of research into the many ways a fire can prevent breathing, and cause other traumata (clinical shock etc.) that would lead to pretty rapid death before the victim's body had been much burnt.Not at all fantasy. There are people who have carried out experiments about that (with dummy condemned of course). Measurements of temperature and analysis of the air confirm the deadly impact of hot, toxic air within a few minutes; long before burning itself would kill.
Sounds rather like Southern barbecue.which may have been the actual cause of death when people were burnt at the stake,
in most of Europe, wood needs drying off before it makes a blaze,
for executions, damp wood would have sufficed, slow burning made for a slower death,
and more likely by suffocation, dehydration etc. rather than high-temperature burning.
The Scots invented the game except they call it Gof without the L.WHAT?!? You don't believe in Nessie? But we have pictures!
And besides, Scots never lie (except at golf).
View attachment 889725View attachment 889726View attachment 889727
If we are gonna have stake, I will bring the A1 sauce.Oh I think we could squeeze the ducking stool in there somewhere....
Dunked until you confess. Wearing the thinnest of clingy dresses.
Then of course... after you've dried out a bit ...off to the stake. Think we'll leave your hair wet though. Yes.
Ha, very funny! But once we're allowed to cross the border, you'll burn for your flippancy!If we are gonna have stake, I will bring the A1 sauce.
She is overdone... I prefer them 'rare'!!!
Absolutly. Theres no way sensible, i.e. not overly theatrical fire would suffocate you at all. It would be horrendously slow. There are real life videos ( not erotic in any way i might add) of people burning and it goes on foreverthere is a big difference between a random fire in a building and a stake burning. most deaths by fire in the regular world are actually suffocation deaths. however, a stake burning is specifically designed to prevent that sort of thing. as the oxygen is consumed, new oxygen is pulled in to replace it, and while the heat from the fire is deadly, it's not immediately lethal. remember, there's a difference between something that WILL kill you and something that is INSTANTLY killing you.
oddly enough, most deaths at the stake would have been caused by drowning... i know that sounds weird, but what would happen is that as the superheated air rose, eventually it would be inhaled, and the lungs would be seared, causing a slow suffocation while the person burned.
i've seen quite a few, and have done more than a little research on the topic. there was one from Guatemala that last seemingly forever, and only ended when the mob finally had enough and just poured lighter fluid on her. the most amazing ones are the people who are actually able to survive burnings (for a little while, anyway; they usually don't live long after), despite having the ordeal last quite a while. burnings are horrific.Absolutly. Theres no way sensible, i.e. not overly theatrical fire would suffocate you at all. It would be horrendously slow. There are real life videos ( not erotic in any way i might add) of people burning and it goes on forever
Edit: they could have made it erotic, but mainly acts of impromptu clownery & evil, so not
I think a lot of us BatS fetishists have stumbled across that particular videoi've seen quite a few, and have done more than a little research on the topic. there was one from Guatemala that last seemingly forever, and only ended when the mob finally had enough and just poured lighter fluid on her. the most amazing ones are the people who are actually able to survive burnings (for a little while, anyway; they usually don't live long after), despite having the ordeal last quite a while. burnings are horrific.
obviously, most accidental fire deaths aren't the same type of thing, especially inside an enclosure.
that a pretty infamous one. she lasts the better part of an hour in agony. there's a follow up where the fire is out and she is still alive and screaming, and that's when someone comes by and dumps the lighter fluid.I think a lot of us BatS fetishists have stumbled across that particular video
Yup. I still don't understand why they didn't even bother to do them properly. Chasing someone around trying to light them on fire is not a very efficent way of taking care of that particular form of execution.that a pretty infamous one. she lasts the better part of an hour in agony. there's a follow up where the fire is out and she is still alive and screaming, and that's when someone comes by and dumps the lighter fluid.
there's another one from india that actually goes more than an hour. if anything, i think we underestimate how long they take when we try to make it erotic.