Mother Superior's privilege!Here is someone who is against the loincloth!
Full pics on this page:
Like this ?? ....In general, I don’t care for loincloths, but there is one exception. That being when it is wrapped low around the condemned’s waist, and tied loosely at one side. Once the condemned is raised and the struggling begins, it’s only a matter of time before the knot loosens further and the loincloth slides down and is draped uselessly between the condemned’s legs and the cross
My personal opinion, is that wearing an ugly loincloth more humiliating that being nude. I might be somewhat special here, but I am sure that at least the more confident and the beautiful females are alike. And is "body-shaming" not a good reason for crucifixion as punishment?I don't like loincloths!
I believe that for more humiliation, the crucified future must be completely naked for all of his ordeal from his condemnation then his flogging, his "via crucis" and his crucifixion.
Funny to note that vagina, penis and asshole mostly show fewer imperfections as the rest of the body......Those married to the cross should be stark naked and positioned, nailed/bound in the most obscene posture possible. No parts of their bodies shall be covered. Modesty is a luxury. All of their endowments, imperfections, body hair (sparse or lush) and most intimate orifices - vagina, penis/meatus, anus, should be on display and available for the most close inspection by onlookers.