Does it count as a loincloth when it doesn't cover the loins?
Does it count as a loincloth when it doesn't cover the loins?
Yeah,anything round the waist is good.Does it count as a loincloth when it doesn't cover the loins?
Yeah,anything round the waist is good.
Yeah,naked is good,but a loincloth teases....Hmmm, maybe i can share this when it comes to males, but if the victim is a woman,
i have now completely changed my mind after a posting to that theme in the "Markus"
thread "Pleasure in suffering" (Crucified Women)
After comparing HUNDREDS of the pictures from Markus, showing all kinds of loinclothes
and also all versions of pure naked women, i came to the conclusion that FOR ME, there
is no better and no more arousing view possible than PURE NAKED )))))
I didn't notice this before, but the discussion about it gave me a final decision for myself.
Damn, LOVE women and i mostly love them NAKED in EVERY possible situation ))))))
Yep....a PERFECT Loincloth...A small white sheet coated in sperm and tied at the hips; too easy for executioners to tear off
View attachment 865301
J'éprouve une énorme excitation à cette idée. Dans la foule qui assiste à mon exécution il y a une femme qui m'aime et qui se rend compte que ce sexe maintenant mis à nu ne pourra plus lui procurer du plaisir.Agree wholeheartedly. Barely covering him or her, titillation for the spectators and humiliation for the victims. Yet, knowing how little covering is there builds the ultimate embarrassment at the time and place of torture when they are stripped naked and spread on the cross for all to see. And the specter of being tortured in the midst of gawking spectators, all captivated by your intimate display would truly be the best of both worlds.
A classic image...