• Sign up or login, and you'll have full access to opportunities of forum.

Obscene Display.

Go to CruxDreams.com
两张照片添加到乐趣!
Qasqas, her thighs are disappointingly closed, but any opportunity to see Red Sonja naked is more than welcome. ;)
 

Attachments

  • 676849F9-8C8F-462C-A3A5-D86BB246ADE9.jpeg
    676849F9-8C8F-462C-A3A5-D86BB246ADE9.jpeg
    111 KB · Views: 692
Thehangingtree's thread


does not involve crux, but his manip of Barb dancing at the end of a rope called out for inclusion here. :eeek::babeando::rolleyes:
 

Attachments

  • 9A143B29-4172-43CE-876D-0C166A718495.jpeg
    9A143B29-4172-43CE-876D-0C166A718495.jpeg
    185.7 KB · Views: 792
Thehangingtree's thread


does not involve crux, but his manip of Barb dancing at the end of a rope called out for inclusion here. :eeek::babeando::rolleyes:
I suspect some demerits might be headed your way...unless Barb's opinion of this perspective has drastically changed.
 
Thehangingtree's thread


does not involve crux, but his manip of Barb dancing at the end of a rope called out for inclusion here. :eeek::babeando::rolleyes:
Personally, I think it captures Barb's best side (taking cover from incoming demerits).
:spank::spank::spank::spank::spank:
 
A fellow on Quora had these observations about slaves and crucifixion, which are certainly plausible:

They usually weren’t. That would have been sort of stupid, since slaves were valuable property who did work for their owners, and crucified slaves can’t, you know, work.

The Romans crucified slaves captured in servile rebellions because that was considered making war on the state, and since slaves were non-citizens of Rome, they received the legal punishment for capital offenses against the state by a non-citizen. That was crucifixion. The Romans could have simply returned them to slavery, but they felt it was more important to make an example out of them by brutally executing them. Furthermore, a slave that has already rebelled once is a danger to do so again.


Of course when you look at it pure from a point of view of monetary efficiency this would be right.
Better sell a slave then crucify them.
However crucifixion is one of the things that has a psychological impact as well.

Seeing a fellow slave crucified would be quite a deterrent to any slave bad behaviour.
Running away from your master is rebellion to your master, and indirect rebellion to the roman system.
A lot of other crimes can be seen as rebelious too. stealing, assault, disobidience etc.

As for the value of slaves, They weren't dirt cheap, but most cost was in their maintenance: food, clothing etc.
Value ofc dependend on skills, age/health, attitude, obidience and other factors as well.
Some compare slaves and their maintainance with buying a new car and the taxes/maintenance/fuelcosts for a car.
The car in itself is not cheap, but a lot of cost is in the car's use.

The less value you had for your master the easier it was for a master to take the loss of your value, save on your maintenance cost and get rid of you. Selling to the mines or galleys/other horrible very short lived jobs, or have them crucified.

Some more levelheaded master would probably try to sell the unwanted slaves.
Others more emotional ones would give into rage over a slight and have them crucified.
Honor is Roman society was an other factor.
IF a slave would do something that would diminish the honor of the family to the public,
crucifixion or even having them whipped in public would probably be a better choice then selling that slave.

To only look at the supposed economic value of slaves is quite shortsighted.
It is only one of many factors involved with a masters decision how to punish or get rid of a "rebelious" slave.
 
Last edited:
To only look at the supposed economic value of slaves is quite shortsighted.
It is only one of many factors involved with a masters decision how to punish or get rid of a "rebelious" slave.
Correct on all counts, Crumera. None of which factors into my own coarse and degraded preferred fantasies, "From high society to a low cross"

71A95D51-2A46-403B-ABDD-EFF6BBA31D3A.jpegE31B7855-E8BC-43DC-B9D6-C0D362BB72A7.jpeg
and "Innocents at the mercy of the Wicked." :eeek: :babeando::very_hot:

6218324B-0DAC-455D-A4B7-8393755A8182.jpeg8A6287EF-8685-4330-AE2F-CF43F9458FD5.jpeg

"This is fantasy! Careless product of wild imagination!" :D
 
does not involve crux, but his manip of Barb dancing at the end of a rope called out for inclusion here. :eeek::babeando::rolleyes:
This picture would fit well in my story about Alisa's ordeals.
 
Browsing again through Markus stuff


and although my memory is more untrustworthy than most, I don’t think I’ve posted most of these before. :eeek: :babeando::rolleyes:
 

Attachments

  • 1C2D4A16-CD79-4DCD-8399-18C461F64570.jpeg
    1C2D4A16-CD79-4DCD-8399-18C461F64570.jpeg
    577.4 KB · Views: 658
  • 3E4472AA-8FD0-43AD-9AAD-22D75EA7195C.jpeg
    3E4472AA-8FD0-43AD-9AAD-22D75EA7195C.jpeg
    353.6 KB · Views: 599
  • 9A7BCD95-FD37-488B-AE5D-C8587850A70D.jpeg
    9A7BCD95-FD37-488B-AE5D-C8587850A70D.jpeg
    279.7 KB · Views: 600
  • 29EBE7C8-A625-4370-AFFB-A7EBFAEBE1C1.jpeg
    29EBE7C8-A625-4370-AFFB-A7EBFAEBE1C1.jpeg
    196.9 KB · Views: 588
  • C5A5D29B-C399-4166-9FCE-BF20BEC167E9.jpeg
    C5A5D29B-C399-4166-9FCE-BF20BEC167E9.jpeg
    212.8 KB · Views: 567
  • 45B303FA-2E19-4E04-A02F-0CDBB12CC9CF.jpeg
    45B303FA-2E19-4E04-A02F-0CDBB12CC9CF.jpeg
    195.4 KB · Views: 553
  • 7E402770-932C-410D-A1D9-5F75C91975D3.jpeg
    7E402770-932C-410D-A1D9-5F75C91975D3.jpeg
    227.8 KB · Views: 551
  • 95C2FEEF-EE65-4F42-A92D-08B7CA82BE89.jpeg
    95C2FEEF-EE65-4F42-A92D-08B7CA82BE89.jpeg
    155.1 KB · Views: 620
Slightly altered Noble Vulchur pics, and one by Markus, all from this entry on Imagefap


a gallery site which is, for anyone just tuning into this paraphilia, an immense introductory collection of naked women hanging on crosses.

 

Attachments

  • 9FE92A3E-5FFB-4627-A20F-7D3A40F64E20.jpeg
    9FE92A3E-5FFB-4627-A20F-7D3A40F64E20.jpeg
    75.6 KB · Views: 567
  • 8176E9FD-E230-4BBA-8650-4027D553DB13.jpeg
    8176E9FD-E230-4BBA-8650-4027D553DB13.jpeg
    52.6 KB · Views: 553
  • F576BE20-B112-4E25-A1FD-7D4E1C155879.jpeg
    F576BE20-B112-4E25-A1FD-7D4E1C155879.jpeg
    138.5 KB · Views: 537
  • A0CAFEAD-D3DE-484A-A1B4-CFB5FC9883EA.jpeg
    A0CAFEAD-D3DE-484A-A1B4-CFB5FC9883EA.jpeg
    58 KB · Views: 579
  • 27DF1BCC-DA48-4F6E-A6A6-464FD931328B.jpeg
    27DF1BCC-DA48-4F6E-A6A6-464FD931328B.jpeg
    48.5 KB · Views: 542
  • BBA8F253-547E-4D6A-BC14-1963C5B377DF.jpeg
    BBA8F253-547E-4D6A-BC14-1963C5B377DF.jpeg
    133.5 KB · Views: 702
Found a lot of art there with the colors weirdly altered and the signatures removed! Many such cases! Your be better served if you knew the artist, so you could search them up on a lovely site called cruxforums.com and see the rest of their work if you really liked what you saw. Artist’s signatures aren’t just for ego; they help the reader know who drew the art, and potentially where to find more. Take this random one. It was done by m0zg, a rather prolific fellow who makes all kinds of erotic snuff art. If you only saw this version, you’d never get to see all of his amazing work. Also, these issues appear to be mass-processed through a neural network that attempts to color them naively. But M0zg’s original colors were deliberate! Just two streams of red; very provocative. And it’s Triss Marigold! Her hair was red and her titulus was witch! Those weren’t optional details!

Overall I am underwhelmed, and disappointed. These are low effort copy paste jobs that are trying to avoid being detected as copies instead of giving the tiniest shred of credit to the artists!
 

Attachments

  • E501F29B-4369-4CCD-B1AC-6E24DEE538A1.jpeg
    E501F29B-4369-4CCD-B1AC-6E24DEE538A1.jpeg
    71.3 KB · Views: 676
Last edited:
I disagree strongly that it’s a good introduction to the kink. The pictures don’t tell you which artist made them or which photographer took them, and rarely reveal anything more than “woman on cross 184”. I’m flattered to see my own art in weird places, but no one but these content mills profit anything from having signatures removed. Not the artists, the viewers, or the culture. I don’t think we should enable this practice.
 
I disagree strongly that it’s a good introduction to the kink. The pictures don’t tell you which artist made them or which photographer took them, and rarely reveal anything more than “woman on cross 184”. I’m flattered to see my own art in weird places, but no one but these content mills profit anything from having signatures removed. Not the artists, the viewers, or the culture. I don’t think we should enable this practice.
I completely agree !
 
Yes, spotted some @mp5stab ’s there, as well as a few of mine
74FB9FFF-A464-4645-BAA0-1D8DD8AD0C76.jpeg4CAD10EC-560C-40E8-920D-7CE1919CD2A8.jpeg
don’t know if my signature got removed or if I forgot to sign them in the first place! The colour grading is weird though; looks like they have been piddled on.. :confused:
(Edit, they left my sig on this one at least)
84FB7E76-2BF0-45FC-97B5-AEEE89ECB9E4.jpeg
 
Last edited by a moderator:
I disagree strongly that it’s a good introduction to the kink. The pictures don’t tell you which artist made them or which photographer took them, and rarely reveal anything more than “woman on cross 184”. I’m flattered to see my own art in weird places, but no one but these content mills profit anything from having signatures removed. Not the artists, the viewers, or the culture. I don’t think we should enable this practice.
Valid points all, Em, and if Imagefap were a paysite I would share your distaste, even anger.

But I put myself in the place of the newbie I was in 2002, stumbling across her

B98383ED-9DA9-4005-A7F4-EF4932805CF7.jpeg

and her

D03A6302-A598-480C-94ED-E71E5199B49E.jpeg

and spending months trying to find others like them. It took me almost a year to find Hufkens' site, and later the Yahoo crux group. I would have mortgaged my soul to come across that IF collection that very first night.
 
Further, do I understand that you, Messaline and Monty never heard of the IF crux collections? I am surprised.
 
Back
Top Bottom