• Sign up or login, and you'll have full access to opportunities of forum.

Posting Images

Go to CruxDreams.com

Eulalia

Poet Laureate
Staff member
I'd add, it depends how you use her. In a scene with other young women - say a slave-sale - she might not stand out as much different, but avoid images that draw attention to and emphasise her 'undeveloped' look, which make the model look like an underage youngster, even if she may actually be 18+.
 

Wragg

Chronicler of Crux
Staff member
Hi Camcrux, I'm getting nowhere with reverse searches, I'm sorry. :(

Two hopes remain; firstly this is clearly a png where the model has been subtracted from her background, and that is foxing the searches. You don't by any chance have the original with her in a background, do you?

The second hope is that one of the geniuses on this site will come along and say, "Ah, yes, that's Jane Smith, and she was forty-two when that picture was taken."

Otherwise, as Eul says, strictly non sexual and clothed. I shall delete her from this thread if we don't get an answer in a day or so.

Sorry...
 

Thunar

Assistant executioner
My very first impression of that pic was that's not a photo but a render, I'm still not sure. But if in doubt, why not search for a girl with a similar shape from a source you can be safe ?
 

melissa

Administrator
Staff member
Would this incur the underage ban ? The girl does look rather young. I have her booked for a possible new picture.
As I don't visit underage sites I think she's "over 18" but I don't remember who she is or where I found her so I can't be sure. What do you think ?

View attachment 928564
She doesn't look real. More of a computer generated head superimposed on a real body. If somebody said that she was any age between 16 and 24 I could see no reason to doubt them. If as I suspect that she's some "hybrid" then you won't find her with any image search.
 

montycrusto

Slave Trader
She doesn't look real. More of a computer generated head superimposed on a real body. If somebody said that she was any age between 16 and 24 I could see no reason to doubt them. If as I suspect that she's some "hybrid" then you won't find her with any image search.
I believe there are signs of photo editing; the shadow line along the chin (for example) is very suspicious; I think this head doesn’t belong on this body. Possibly the head is over-18 and the body under-18.. or vice versa. :confused:
 

Darkprincess69

High Priestess of Slaanesh
My very first impression of that pic was that's not a photo but a render, I'm still not sure. But if in doubt, why not search for a girl with a similar shape from a source you can be safe ?
Definitely not a render, but clearly an image in which the background has been erased to make it easier to do manips with it. She does look a tad young, but is probably 18 or more, although it's very hard to judge age by appearance alone. Several years ago there was a legal case where a guy was accused of posessing images of an underage girl, but in fact it turned out to be Melissa Ashley, who is famously flat-chested and waif-like. He explained this to the police but they chose to prosecute him anyway, and Ms Ashley herself appeared in court as a witness for the defence and was able to prove that she was 26 (iirc) at the time the photos were taken, and thus he was aquitted.
 

CamCrux

Guard
Definitely not a render, but clearly an image in which the background has been erased to make it easier to do manips with it. She does look a tad young, but is probably 18 or more, although it's very hard to judge age by appearance alone. Several years ago there was a legal case where a guy was accused of posessing images of an underage girl, but in fact it turned out to be Melissa Ashley, who is famously flat-chested and waif-like. He explained this to the police but they chose to prosecute him anyway, and Ms Ashley herself appeared in court as a witness for the defence and was able to prove that she was 26 (iirc) at the time the photos were taken, and thus he was aquitted.
OK, thanks to all for your help and interest and to reply to your posts : this is definitely a photo, not a render, and it's possible that the head and body come from 2 different persons because at a time I was an adept of head transplant :). I've had this pic for quite some time and never used it until now.
It doesn't change much to the problem in any case of course.
And no, I no longer have the background.
I was (still am ?) planning to use her in a scene where she is a young captive from a Germanic tribe and rebelling against her new Roman owners, and being confronted by them. There is nothing overtly sexual in the scene (except her being naked of course).
I might cover her with a light tunic, breasts and all, all the more as her complete nakedness is hard to account for rationally in the scene. Would that make it alright or would it still be a no-no ?
 

thehangingtree

Proconsul
Staff member
OK, thanks to all for your help and interest and to reply to your posts : this is definitely a photo, not a render, and it's possible that the head and body come from 2 different persons because at a time I was an adept of head transplant :)
I doesn't change much to the problem in any case.
And no, I no longer have the background.
I was (am ?) planning to use her in a scene where she is a young captive from a Germanic tribe and rebelling against her new Roman owners. There is nothing overtly sexual in the scene (except the nudity of course).
I might cover her with a light tunic, all the more as her complete nakedness is hard to account for rationally in the scene. Would that make it alright or would it still be a no-no ?
Don't worry, even i have posted 'flatter-looking' women than her! And don't bother with the tunic unless you wish to...
 

Darkprincess69

High Priestess of Slaanesh
OK, thanks to all for your help and interest and to reply to your posts : this is definitely a photo, not a render, and it's possible that the head and body come from 2 different persons because at a time I was an adept of head transplant :). I've had this pic for quite some time and never used it until now.
It doesn't change much to the problem in any case of course.
And no, I no longer have the background.
I was (still am ?) planning to use her in a scene where she is a young captive from a Germanic tribe and rebelling against her new Roman owners, and being confronted by them. There is nothing overtly sexual in the scene (except her being naked of course).
I might cover her with a light tunic, breasts and all, all the more as her complete nakedness is hard to account for rationally in the scene. Would that make it alright or would it still be a no-no ?
At this point I would say go ahead and post anyway. If the mods feel that it falls foul of the rules then they can always delete it, but the fact that you have clearly conducted due dilligence by discussing it with everybody in here should keep you safe from any official reprimands :)
 

CamCrux

Guard
Don't worry, even i have posted 'flatter-looking' women than her! And don't bother with the tunic unless you wish to...
But I don't want my picture to be banned and even less to be dragged into jail for pedophilia :) !!
Would this incur the underage ban ? The girl does look rather young. I have her booked for a possible new picture.
As I don't visit underage sites I think she's "over 18" but I don't remember who she is or where I found her so I can't be sure. What do you think ?

View attachment 929001
Cool ! I love the dressed version !
 

Wragg

Chronicler of Crux
Staff member
OK, thanks to all for your help and interest and to reply to your posts : this is definitely a photo, not a render, and it's possible that the head and body come from 2 different persons because at a time I was an adept of head transplant :). I've had this pic for quite some time and never used it until now.
It doesn't change much to the problem in any case of course.
And no, I no longer have the background.
I was (still am ?) planning to use her in a scene where she is a young captive from a Germanic tribe and rebelling against her new Roman owners, and being confronted by them. There is nothing overtly sexual in the scene (except her being naked of course).
I might cover her with a light tunic, breasts and all, all the more as her complete nakedness is hard to account for rationally in the scene. Would that make it alright or would it still be a no-no ?
Thanks Cam, and thanks all.

Feel free to ping it at me in a pm if you like. Meantime I've given her Josephine's old dress to wear.
 

Eulalia

Poet Laureate
Staff member
I was (still am ?) planning to use her in a scene where she is a young captive from a Germanic tribe and rebelling against her new Roman owners, and being confronted by them. There is nothing overtly sexual in the scene (except her being naked of course).
That seems to me to be the kind of scene where she'd be fine.

It's helpful that you've raised this question, an opportunity to clarify an issue that we're obviously having to make judgements on pretty well daily.
 

melissa

Administrator
Staff member
At this point I would say go ahead and post anyway. If the mods feel that it falls foul of the rules then they can always delete it, but the fact that you have clearly conducted due dilligence by discussing it with everybody in here should keep you safe from any official reprimands :)
I agree with DP.
 

Darkprincess69

High Priestess of Slaanesh
I have some files with a jfif extension and I cannot seem to upload them. Any ideas?
Try renaming them to .jpg - the actual file format should still be readable (depending on how well your OS supports the standard of course). Try posting one here to test it. It seems that Windows 10 in particular tends to save JPG files as JFIF, which is causing problems for those people stuck in the Windows ecosystem. Technically, all JFIF files are JPG, but not all JPG are actually JFIF.

Personally I've not come across a JFIF that wouldn't read as a JPG, but there may well be some out there, somewhere. Just try renaming and it will probably work just fine
 
Top Bottom