D
Deleted member 16647
Guest
Thks for the pictures
It was a bad movie. The book is much more interesting
Last edited by a moderator:
Thks for the pictures
My introduction to the lifestyle and still a favourite.
QUOTE="Pierre771, post: 469528, member: 16647"]Another detail : don't generalize ! Being interested by the person, not his sex (if it is really your case), is being pansexual, not bi-sexualAll be-sexual persons are not pansexual !Pansexuality is a special sexual orientation
The aim or sexuality in our species is pleasure, not reproductionModern PC tripe.
Nature created (basically) 2 sexes. What we call male (sperm donater) and female (egg donater). There are some creatures that can perform both functions.
The rest of it is stupidities created by humans to justify their personal sexual desires and proclivities.
Nature has no need of any sexual activity that doesn't propagate the species.
We do.
kisses
willowfall
The pleasure is to get us to copulate, and thus perpetuate the species.The aim or sexuality in our species is pleasure, not reproduction
If you are talking to me (it's not clear), there is a total misunderstanding (read my posts above)...We are not thankfully wired the same .
Thks for the pictures
It was a bad movie. The book is much more interesting
The pleasure is to get us to copulate, and thus perpetuate the species.
The pleasure is to get us to copulate, and thus perpetuate the species.
The mechanism is different : nobody 'decided' to build a mechanism to perpetuate the species (it's creationnism)
Sexuality is selected because without it the species (and other species which use that kind of mechanism) would disappear and sexuality too !
I think it is a very prevalent male fantasy to want every woman to be bi-sexual. Men somehow thinks that increases their chances for a FFM 3some.
I really love the first illustration and the contrast of ages in the second one.