• Sign up or login, and you'll have full access to opportunities of forum.

Predating.

Go to CruxDreams.com
I guess I'm the odd one out, but after so m much of the same thing, it became kind of boring. Overload, I think. How many ways are there to depict a blow job and still be interesting? Even the girl on girl pix didn't move me this time, and I never expected to say that. Oh, well, there's plenty more to see, so enjoy, my friends.

Didn't mean to pee in the punch bowl or anything... :eek: Sorry
 
I guess I'm the odd one out, but after so m much of the same thing, it became kind of boring. Overload, I think. How many ways are there to depict a blow job and still be interesting? Even the girl on girl pix didn't move me this time, and I never expected to say that. Oh, well, there's plenty more to see, so enjoy, my friends.

Didn't mean to pee in the punch bowl or anything... :eek: Sorry
Thanks for the like, Apostate!
 
I guess I'm the odd one out, but after so m much of the same thing, it became kind of boring. Overload, I think. How many ways are there to depict a blow job and still be interesting? Even the girl on girl pix didn't move me this time, and I never expected to say that. Oh, well, there's plenty more to see, so enjoy, my friends.

Didn't mean to pee in the punch bowl or anything... :eek: Sorry

You do realize pee is a popular fetish, right? :rolleyes:
 
Nice reminder how the crap going down during the Vietnam-goddam-nam Era puts present day crap in perspective.

I believe therefore that a few late 60’s blowjobs are in order. :rolleyes:

(Keep in mind these people are in their 70’s now.)
All these pics ... simply affirm my switching teams!

I gagggggg!

Never could do or wanted to do it!




DA118FFD-0203-4C20-9268-9E390E5DB47F.jpeg
 
I do love me some vintage porn, but there does seem to be a distinct lack of girl-on-girl action in here so let's redress the balance a bit :p

These two look like late Victorian or early Edwardian era. Difficult to tell for sure but around the beginning of the 20th century I think
672.jpg DT23506W4AEa0VL.jpg

These ones look like they're from the 1920s or early 30s maybe
0a3e810ad4a2994d89765b65ae5aabaf--vintage-lesbian-vintage-girls.jpg 7a1a0c8246a7e8a0a835aa57960a1f13--vintage-lesbian-vintage-lingerie.jpg Fdznfz5IMNp8YrqOQ9f2dyrZ6RrhvZjEu7JunmaSH2M.jpg

This one claims be be 1930s
classic-vintage-lesbian-erotic-nude-french-postcard-1930s-07.jpg

This pic says 1940s. Not 100% sure but looks like it could be
79827_0dec00f.jpg

Definitely 1950s
article-0-1908B376000005DC-994_634x807.jpg

This is probably late 1960s or early 70s - very hard to tell for sure
80EC412.jpg

And this one is surely 1980s - does that count as vintage now? It is almost 40 years ago (Damn that's scary! :eek:)
665_1000.jpg
 

Attachments

  • F2C847BD-A560-461D-83AA-7D48E3D9EAA5.jpeg
    F2C847BD-A560-461D-83AA-7D48E3D9EAA5.jpeg
    220.7 KB · Views: 64
I do love me some vintage porn, but there does seem to be a distinct lack of girl-on-girl action in here so let's redress the balance a bit :p

These two look like late Victorian or early Edwardian era. Difficult to tell for sure but around the beginning of the 20th century I think
View attachment 802436 View attachment 802440

These ones look like they're from the 1920s or early 30s maybe
View attachment 802432 View attachment 802433 View attachment 802441

This one claims be be 1930s
View attachment 802439

This pic says 1940s. Not 100% sure but looks like it could be
View attachment 802438

Definitely 1950s
View attachment 802444

This is probably late 1960s or early 70s - very hard to tell for sure
View attachment 802434

And this one is surely 1980s - does that count as vintage now? It is almost 40 years ago (Damn that's scary! :eek:)
View attachment 802435

Some years ago there was a Courbet exhibition in New York, and I got to see Le Sommeil.

5FED2C7E-8F0B-4B43-9817-78498AAB0868.jpeg

In 1866 a Turkish diplomat commissioned it for his high priced private porn stash. The painting is life sized, and although I knew it from pictures the effect was, as the Brits say, gobsmacking. :babeando:

I’m sure the rest of the fellow's collection included less costly examples. :rolleyes:
 

Attachments

  • B8CD0A62-F538-4DA8-B24A-A89FF137C4F7.jpeg
    B8CD0A62-F538-4DA8-B24A-A89FF137C4F7.jpeg
    73.6 KB · Views: 56
  • 5BC92E95-2130-4D7D-ACDA-0FE0E45EE79A.jpeg
    5BC92E95-2130-4D7D-ACDA-0FE0E45EE79A.jpeg
    330.6 KB · Views: 56
  • 91F0448A-1BAD-4A75-8738-066EA660376A.jpeg
    91F0448A-1BAD-4A75-8738-066EA660376A.jpeg
    96.5 KB · Views: 59
  • D70D57B3-489B-4984-9F39-04BF98D46FED.jpeg
    D70D57B3-489B-4984-9F39-04BF98D46FED.jpeg
    49.5 KB · Views: 57
Last edited:
Ladies, this thread was dedicated to eww yucky antique cocksucking,

B5077F13-4133-4733-8A60-19140C8A1118.jpegF74C1AB2-603F-41E2-BB21-C4CC9E8466F7.jpeg6367D952-D2CE-4387-8DF1-69A9FBFB5E8A.jpegC17D7B1E-8CDC-474B-B77E-0B3588850301.jpeg

but depictions of antique cunnilingus are actually more commonplace online,

52EA0829-B48C-4E0B-89E2-7B58C0E9AAFA.jpeg803F9D89-BB10-4F80-8FA6-C5457446B6DD.jpeg0AF8371B-28A0-4B65-8AF5-6C2911C612DF.jpeg2818359F-D825-4C36-AEFD-342977595EC4.png

and I have no objections to posting them here. ;)
 
Hey, Apostate, I'M nearly in my 70s!
I do love me some vintage porn, but there does seem to be a distinct lack of girl-on-girl action in here so let's redress the balance a bit :p

These two look like late Victorian or early Edwardian era. Difficult to tell for sure but around the beginning of the 20th century I think
View attachment 802436 View attachment 802440

These ones look like they're from the 1920s or early 30s maybe
View attachment 802432 View attachment 802433 View attachment 802441

This one claims be be 1930s
View attachment 802439

This pic says 1940s. Not 100% sure but looks like it could be
View attachment 802438

Definitely 1950s
View attachment 802444

This is probably late 1960s or early 70s - very hard to tell for sure
View attachment 802434

And this one is surely 1980s - does that count as vintage now? It is almost 40 years ago (Damn that's scary! :eek:)
View attachment 802435
I know who is in the
50’s pic!

Anyone? Anyone?

Bueller? Bueller?



;)
 
Ten years ago Esquire magazine did rather slanted survey of American women.


It featured some innovative graphs.

Well visualisation is all the rage in data analytics these days. So only 5% wouldn't do it? This is a survey of readers of Esquire I take it?
I'm surprised it wasn't 75% "yuk!" or 80% "It's too big", or indeed 50% "OK, but I don't swallow"
toobig.jpg

then again
1340699979289_578012.png
 
Back
Top Bottom