will start in the very near future in this thread.....................in english french and german
agree but read the avant-propos/prefaceTo reduce "Histoire d'O" in a succession of pornographic drawings is easy, sure!
And easy is the "avant-propos" which eliminates all criticism...
But where is the deep sense of "Histoire d'O", here ?
Just my opinion....
Messaline
...And easy is the "avant-propos" which eliminates all criticism...
To reduce "Histoire d'O" in a succession of pornographic drawings is easy, sure!
And easy is the "avant-propos" which eliminates all criticism...
But where is the deep sense of "Histoire d'O", here ?
Just my opinion....
Messaline
agree but read the avant-propos/preface
I like the pics I think they are superior pornography but I can understand the point that they are more pornographic than strictly erotic (while being aware that any such judgement is subjective to a high degree).
Tree will wade in on two levels...
one, he doubts these are 'pure' drawings. Predating any photo shop type programs it was widely known to take a photo print, pencil or ink it, the immerse the image in certain chemicals to remove the 'photo'. My father showed me how to do it when I was a little tyke (though with less racy subject matter) and the same effects are much easier and ecologically friendlier in today's computer programs...
that sounds even harder than drawing to me!
in 1980?If you use the same subject the proportions stay very accurate...
I don't have it but I think a pro version of Photoshop will take a color photo and with the click of a tool key it is done!!!
Tree