Cornu Using

[dfg42]

Itching powder or gel rubbed on the cornu will add another dimension to the suffering!

You would enter the field of Rhaphanidosis , figging, gingering etc. Guess most of us have put in such things into the asshole, as I said cucumber or, so. I tried radish.



I didn't feel anything special, I guess you have to peel it. Well guess, I went far enough with the above pic.

 

[culus]

You would enter the field of Rhaphanidosis , figging, gingering etc. Guess most of us have put in such things into the asshole, as I said cucumber or, so. I tried radish.

View attachment 1324862

I didn't feel anything special, I guess you have to peel it. Well guess, I went far enough with the above pic.

Yes, fresh ginger should be peeled for maximum effect on the anal/rectal tissue.

 

[Eulalia]

I didn't feel anything special, I guess you have to peel it.

Did you make sure to commit adultery first?

 

[dfg42]

Did you make sure to commit adultery first?

No, actually not, but I am now allowed to fuck some married women.

 

[RopeSavageCrux]

I would want a didlo in my ass on the cross.. after I get used when laying there tied to the beam. Some rape fun please and then hanging me up and push the didlo in my ass. As I am having it hang there.. yeah please.

 

[dfg42]

I would want a didlo in my ass on the cross.. after I get used when laying there tied to the beam. Some rape fun please and then hanging me up and push the didlo in my ass. As I am having it hang there.. yeah please.

Don't enjoy it to much The idea is to humiliate you, but I see that anal sex becomes so normal it becomes useless to use the rape and the cornu in crucifixion as punishment, or crucifixion becomes, say without nails, but with rape and cornu, something like a "normal" thing. My fantasy is to use a soft version of it, as
- sport event
- initiaton
- normal church service

How is your dildo- and rape experiences without crucifixion?

 

[dfg42]

If a cornu is used on me, how is the size determined that it would not damage me permanently?

That could become a problem for the executioners, since one probably would not want that the crucified makes internal bleeding, using vaginal limits it to small penis size, using the anal, which probably is prefered since most culture think it is more obscene, one must find ways that after the first about 15cm the sigmoid colon is adapted to the cornu geometry, that is however possible as we now. I added a list of the diameters of the colons, however we know that can easely expanded as those who were fisted clearly now.

 

[Zorf24]

That could become a problem for the executioners, since one probably would not want that the crucified makes internal bleeding, using vaginal limits it to small penis size, using the anal, which probably is prefered since most culture think it is more obscene, one must find ways that after the first about 15cm the sigmoid colon is adapted to the cornu geometry, that is however possible as we now. I added a list of the diameters of the colons, however we know that can easely expanded as those who were fisted clearly now.

View attachment 1325147

just in general, the anus can take much more than a vagina can. actually when you're not aroused, a vagina is only a couple of inches long. obviously it gets longer when you are aroused, but you are assuming that in all the blinding pain, arousal will somehow happen?

there is also the matter of the cervix being there at the end, and penetration of that hurting far more than accidently entering the intestines.

 

[dfg42]

just in general, the anus can take much more than a vagina can. actually when you're not aroused, a vagina is only a couple of inches long. obviously it gets longer when you are aroused, but you are assuming that in all the blinding pain, arousal will somehow happen?

there is also the matter of the cervix being there at the end, and penetration of that hurting far more than accidently entering the intestines.

I know that and would never used vaginal cornu, due to the gender equality reasons and because ones want to expose the genitals of the crucified. However except one female, all females I know good enough to discuss that matter, believed anal sex hurt more than vaginal sex, but it might due to the fact that I belong to the men which compensate their small penis with big cars (I was however not yet able to convince my health insurance to pay for my car park) that I never heard the females crying:

"Please only fuck my ass, you are to big!"

The only thing I remember is "You could fuck my little hole if you pay more" from a prostitute.

 

[JoeyRainbow]

except one female, all females I know good enough to discuss that matter, believed anal sex hurt more than vaginal sex

Surely this would be due to girth, not length? Plus when you switch out regular human cock for large wooden dildo, that's going to change the calculation.

 

[dfg42]

Surely this would be due to girth, not length? Plus when you switch out regular human cock for large wooden dildo, that's going to change the calculation.

But considering that some vaginas are at about 12-14cm some males (me not, need new sport car!) most penises would be to big and some females I discussed that with were not knowing my size or were discussing it in general. I remember even a hooker, believed in the small hole, we discussed in general, btww. I did not even had sex with her. Yes I make friends and discuss with people even without the intention to fuck with them. Yes, I know, you females can not imagine that!

 

[Zorf24]

Surely this would be due to girth, not length? Plus when you switch out regular human cock for large wooden dildo, that's going to change the calculation.

you nailed it (so to speak). it's a mixture of girth and also lubrication that can make anal uncomfortable, and honestly it can be very pleasurable if done correctly.

but that's not the point, really. the thing is, there is not a very long pathway when sticking something into the birth canal, and there is an upper limit where cervical penetration will become extremely painful and possibly cause long term damage. this is less likely through the anus.

so basically, if you don't care about the long term health of the person (say, if this is an execution), then none of this really matters. something big enough to penetrate deep into your body would cause tremendous pain and would definitely lead to an infection that would kill you over time, but you'll suffocate from the crucifixion long before that happens.

If you intend on the victim surviving and doing minimal damage, then the anus makes more sense.

 

[dfg42]

If you intend on the victim surviving and doing minimal damage, then the anus makes more sense.

And many cultures consider those kind of penetrations as unnaturaly, disguting and shameful, what might be a problem for the crucified.

 

[dfg42]

you nailed it (so to speak). it's a mixture of girth and also lubrication that can make anal uncomfortable, and honestly it can be very pleasurable if done correctly.

but that's not the point, really. the thing is, there is not a very long pathway when sticking something into the birth canal, and there is an upper limit where cervical penetration will become extremely painful and possibly cause long term damage. this is less likely through the anus.

There is one important point we left out. For the audiance it might be more interesting to see an anal penetration of the female because then the vagina is better visible and for the male it is the only possibility.

 

[Zorf24]

There is one important point we left out. For the audiance it might be more interesting to see an anal penetration of the female because then the vagina is better visible and for the male it is the only possibility.

you can make the aesthetic argument for sure. i'm just saying from a biological standpoint, the anus is more capable of taking it without doing damage.

if we are in an execution, this is irrelevant, since damaging the person is the point. although in this case, an anal impalement would be more likely to cause a major hemorrhage and kill the person much faster than a vaginal one. in a vagina impalement, most people die from dehydration, not the impalement. the impalement just causes excruciating pain until your body dies from a lack of upkeep.

 

[dfg42]

you can make the aesthetic argument for sure. i'm just saying from a biological standpoint, the anus is more capable of taking it without doing damage.

if we are in an execution, this is irrelevant, since damaging the person is the point. although in this case, an anal impalement would be more likely to cause a major hemorrhage and kill the person much faster than a vaginal one. in a vagina impalement, most people die from dehydration, not the impalement. the impalement just causes excruciating pain until your body dies from a lack of upkeep.

It could be individual, you surely must try to prevent bleeding one could use poppers, so substances which relax the muscles sphincter and vaginal ones.
Surely putting in a big cornu in the vagina of a female is indicating what slut she is.

 

[dfg42]

I think it's fair to say that the anus is no less erogenous in men than it is in women. My mother's partner is as straight as you can get but he apparently loves anal play and gets off on it. Whether you're straight or gay depends on the sort of partner you choose, not what you do with them.

Putting objects in a guy's ass doesn't make him gay any more than putting them in my vagina makes me straight

I think the notion gay, lesbians etc. are invented to divide the people. The Romans may have used the socially not accepted passsive penetration of adult males (look how many conditions need to be fullfilled: adult, passive...) to degrade the victim. In our society that kind of sex should be accepted. I personally think that all persons should do anal sex, such as they should regularly masturbate. To open the sphincter muscle from below is different than shitting. I go relatively often to a massage and allways go all the way. There is the interesting question if that lowers your continence, I experienced quite the opposite, however that would have to be scientifically researched. For those claiming to be straight: The word your are looking is "coward" not "straight". You have to be men enough to light on your backside letting someone enter your anus. In the case you think it is pain, I recommend to masturbate, because that lowers your pain level.



What females considers, I giess it would be helpful for them to. But all my female partners so far, were against that kind of practise, but it is their problem, indeed.

 

[Darkprincess69]

I think the notion gay, lesbians etc. are invented to divide the people. The Romans may have used the socially not accepted passsive penetration of adult males (look how many conditions need to be fullfilled: adult, passive...) to degrade the victim. In our society that kind of sex should be accepted. I personally think that all persons should do anal sex, such as they should regularly masturbate. To open the sphincter muscle from below is different than shitting. I go relatively often to a massage and allways go all the way. There is the interesting question if that lowers your continence, I experienced quite the opposite, however that would have to be scientifically researched. For those claiming to be straight: The word your are looking is "coward" not "straight". You have to be men enough to light on your backside letting someone enter your anus. In the case you think it is pain, I recommend to masturbate, because that lowers your pain level.

View attachment 1355554

What females considers, I giess it would be helpful for them to. But all my female partners so far, were against that kind of practise, but it is their problem, indeed.

Wow that's a very old post you've dug up there LOL
March 4th 2013 in fact - OK so that's only just over a decade ago which to be fair is a lot better than the levels of post necromancy that I've seen on some forums over the years, but I actually agree with you, but I would take some issue with your use of the word "coward", since not all men will be receptive to the idea of anal penetration (lots of women are not into it either). I don't think it's fair to lavel such people as "cowards" though - not everybody out there is as sexually adventurous as we are in here, after all.

As for the idea of labelling people as a way to divide society, yes you are absolutely correct. While I'm fine with being called a lesbian, I have no time for terms like "gay", "queer", "dyke" etc. Unfortunately there are those people (most especially those in the media) who thrive on creating social division, and I feel that this speaks more to their own lack of social confidence in that they feel the need to demonise those who don't share their opinions. Such levels of tribalism are extremely damaging for all of us and should not be tolerated - after all, it isn't tolerated when the criticism goes the other way....

At the end of the day, I'm just a woman who has always - from a very early age - been attracted to other women. Most people don't seem to have a problem with that and who the fuck cares if they do - my life, my body and my choice - to hell with what anyone else thinks.

Nobody cares these days who you get tuirned on by - it's just not relevant to most people anymore (well not in the western word anyway), and when people (regardless of their sexual orientation) kick back against the media and their "gay agenda" (to use a term invented by that same media), it's not because they're anti-lgbtq+, but simply because they're sick and tired of having it constantly rammed down their throats from all angles in every facet of our modern society and our entertainment. This is NOT doing us any good at all and actually risks causing society to regress back to a time when we did actually persecute gay people (as they still do in evil countries like Russia, China and the middle east - it is those intolerant regimes that need to be targetted by the media agenda, not us in the west for whom this is largey a non-issue and has been at least since the mid 80s

Getting to your final point, yes, I know many women who are opposed to any kind of anal sex. I have to say that in my experience, the majority of these have made that decision without ever trying it, and the majority of those in that group that have subsequently tried it have actually gone on to find it very pleasurable.

I genuinely love anal play - while my tight rear entrance is unable to accommodate the kind of monstrous objects that many porn stars seem to be able to take (I admit to being too scared to take poppers which would probably let my nicely bleached anal swalow much larger objects) I'm fine with average size dildos (plenty of lube though please), and delicately probing fingers (I don't stretch quite enough to take a whole fist though, which is kind of a shame because I'd probaby love it if I could manage it) and of course tongues (oooooh I really love being rimmed - I can rach orgasm by just the thought of a beautiful woman holding my cheeks apart and shoving her tongue right up there ). I love giving anal pleasure to other women too and I've found that most of them have actually enjoyed it immensely. I think it's easy to decide ahead of time that you're not going to enjoy something and then you tense yourself up to the point where any kind of sex is going to be uncomfortable, then the whole experience becomes negative

So yes I think it's great when people try new things, but I would never criticise those who really don't want to do it, for whatever reason. Live and let live - I was put on this earth to give pleasure to women, not to indoctrinate anybody

 

[dfg42]

Wow that's a very old post you've dug up there LOL
March 4th 2013 in fact - OK so that's only just over a decade ago which to be fair is a lot better than the levels of post necromancy that I've seen on some forums over the years, but I actually agree with you, but I would take some issue with your use of the word "coward", since not all men will be receptive to the idea of anal penetration (lots of women are not into it either). I don't think it's fair to lavel such people as "cowards" though - not everybody out there is as sexually adventurous as we are in here, after all.

It is not that they have to like it. I do some things, like cleaning the apartment, also if I don't like it. According to my experience, I didn't want to go into details, it might be
necesssary that you train your sphincter muscle by anal sex to prevent brownish underwear, at least i did. Probably you can also do to much and then the training effect is lost. In my case I probably did it one or twice a month. Since I do not have a male friend for that (that would probably be gayish) I had to pay for the massage of an escort which
results in about 200 bucks each session. I have sometimes luck to find a male who fucks me, but that is seldom, more gay men actually likes to bottom and the straight ones do not only not fuck you, most show a kind of arrogance that I am sad for the females. When is to much? I do not know, but I do observe that your ass hole gets "lengthy", like a vagina and I guess if that occurs it is to much, just show mine now

As for the idea of labelling people as a way to divide society, yes you are absolutely correct. While I'm fine with being called a lesbian, I have no time for terms like "gay", "queer", "dyke" etc. Unfortunately there are those people (most especially those in the media) who thrive on creating social division, and I feel that this speaks more to their own lack of social confidence in that they feel the need to demonise those who don't share their opinions. Such levels of tribalism are extremely damaging for all of us and should not be tolerated - after all, it isn't tolerated when the criticism goes the other way....

At the end of the day, I'm just a woman who has always - from a very early age - been attracted to other women. Most people don't seem to have a problem with that and who the fuck cares if they do - my life, my body and my choice - to hell with what anyone else thinks.

Nobody cares these days who you get tuirned on by - it's just not relevant to most people anymore (well not in the western word anyway), and when people (regardless of their sexual orientation) kick back against the media and their "gay agenda" (to use a term invented by that same media), it's not because they're anti-lgbtq+, but simply because they're sick and tired of having it constantly rammed down their throats from all angles in every facet of our modern society and our entertainment. This is NOT doing us any good at all and actually risks causing society to regress back to a time when we did actually persecute gay people (as they still do in evil countries like Russia, China and the middle east - it is those intolerant regimes that need to be targetted by the media agenda, not us in the west for whom this is largey a non-issue and has been at least since the mid 80s

Getting to your final point, yes, I know many women who are opposed to any kind of anal sex. I have to say that in my experience, the majority of these have made that decision without ever trying it, and the majority of those in that group that have subsequently tried it have actually gone on to find it very pleasurable.

Females indeed do a lot of strange things. It is believed they got less fun, due to the missing prostate, but I believe the fun comes not from the prostate but in my
case it is the feeling how the sphincter muscle get opened, like a massage relief, and how something goes up to your colum perfectly fitting it- But as I said, probably it is needed for health reasons not for fun.

I genuinely love anal play - while my tight rear entrance is unable to accommodate the kind of monstrous objects that many porn stars seem to be able to take (I admit to being too scared to take poppers which would probably let my nicely bleached anal swalow much larger objects) I'm fine with average size dildos (plenty of lube though please), and delicately probing fingers (I don't stretch quite enough to take a whole fist though, which is kind of a shame because I'd probaby love it if I could manage it) and of course tongues (oooooh I really love being rimmed - I can rach orgasm by just the thought of a beautiful woman holding my cheeks apart and shoving her tongue right up there ). I love giving anal pleasure to other women too and I've found that most of them have actually enjoyed it immensely. I think it's easy to decide ahead of time that you're not going to enjoy something and then you tense yourself up to the point where any kind of sex is going to be uncomfortable, then the whole experience becomes negative

So yes I think it's great when people try new things, but I would never criticise those who really don't want to do it, for whatever reason. Live and let live - I was put on this earth to give pleasure to women, not to indoctrinate anybody

Pornstars are not to be considered as role models, although one can get hints from their actions but use your brain. When I look up the anatomy it seems to me that a fist is to big and one most probably should use either an erected penis or an object of comparable size. I do not know if you tried a male doing this on you, as i said not for your pleasure, just to get that experience. i guess it is easier than a dildo of comparable size, because after all males are not that hard at the end....

 

[drD]

Megan, I agree. Real crucifixion is horrible. If you search this forum, you will find a second lady, who was crucified with real nails. She now has carpal tunel, she had immediate medical attention, as soon as she came down. Be careful. Be very, very careful.

Imagine the doc be like "how is everything holy you got these?!" That must have been one intresting conversation.
Edit: I dont intend on jokes there's no jokes to be made with these so please dont read me as someone who jokes around people getting badly injured