• Sign up or login, and you'll have full access to opportunities of forum.

Male pubic hair

Go to CruxDreams.com

cruxbound

Assistant executioner
For quite a few men, the natural covering of the area around the vulva is the subject of careful consideration, vivid debate, and endless discussions. Not surprisingly, there has been quite a lot of "turmoil" at this forum about the pubic hair of females . We men have pubic hair too however. That is, if we don't shave. As a sub to be executed totally naked, my question is therefore whether the ladies have a similar preoccupation with male bushes. And if so, what do they like or prefer?
It's not a poll. You can simply give your answers in writing, as extensively as you wish. Needless to say that men who have an opinion about male public hair are encouraged to respond as well.
 
As a man, myself, my answer to this subject is the same, regardless of the gender of the crucifyee. Yes, please, full bush.
 
Well, since I initiated this thread I guess I'm obliged to give a proper example myself. Although for females I prefer some trimming (landing strip or even a complete triangle, some hair is better than no hair at all) I have a different standard or preference for myself. I'm not shaven or trimmed at all down there. My pubic hair has been part of me for a very long time. I never did any shaving since the first few curly representatives of my bush appeared. It belongs to me. It shapes and accentuates my silhouette when I am without clothing. I have no intention to change that. If my executioner thinks otherwise it is up to him or her to trim it or take it off.
 
When I was in my mid twenties, I had the feeling that during the showers much time was spent cleaning my pubic hair, otherwise it clumped. So I decided to remove it, since no one sees it anyway. That was about the time it became the standard in porn industry. I think the show-off of Pamela Sue Anderson in her "homemovie" and other in porn pics lead to the fact that many, probably most shave.
Pam pam3333.jpeg or mefgh456.jpg older pairnudistpair.jpeg

I think that it is up to every person to decide himself, my personal advice is, that one should shave above a certain age. Probably it could be done I an inauguration party, say at his or her 20th birthday the friends shave the one who has birthday, or at the wedding ceremony that could be done as well.

The final aspect is the public nudity. If there is no hair, indicating some kind of cleanness, the fear of someone sees your. "dirty parts" might be lowered, I am for example promoting public nudity, where it make sense for example in swimming pools, or where security reason might enforce it, say the whole Near East (there are slight differences here between the local authorities and me).
 
"the fear of someone sees your "dirty parts" might be lowered"

That's not what you want in the context of our kink, where nudity is a tool of humiliation. Every element that adds up to the fear of people seeing something that's strictly private under normal circumstances is pure gain. Pubic hair can be clean btw, it's just a matter of care as you already indicated.
 
"the fear of someone sees your "dirty parts" might be lowered"

That's not what you want in the context of our kink, where nudity is a tool of humiliation. Every element that adds up to the fear of people seeing something that's strictly private under normal circumstances is pure gain. Pubic hair can be clean btw, it's just a matter of care as you already indicated.
Naturally, if your aim is the humiliation, I was speaking of people not into that kink.
 
Only 3 reactions and all 3 from males. It seems that the subject does not resonate among the community in general and the female community in particular. That comes with certain advantages too. No need to shave.
 
Only 3 reactions and all 3 from males. It seems that the subject does not resonate among the community in general and the female community in particular. That comes with certain advantages too. No need to shave.
We naturaly know that some Romans shave (see pic from Rome) and they were not crucified. So to be crucified you need to have body hair like a barbaric enemy of the state. So to be shaved prevents me from being crucified, What the females consider they all want to save, so they can show all their vagina: "Look at my honey pot: I am a female, so go on the knee and worship me.' But they would never be looking at nude males, that why one dress the crucified carefully with loincloths, else one would have to restrict the audience to adult males only.
Purefoy-rome-ee4361eb.jpg
 
We naturaly know that some Romans shave (see pic from Rome) and they were not crucified. So to be crucified you need to have body hair like a barbaric enemy of the state. So to be shaved prevents me from being crucified, What the females consider they all want to save, so they can show all their vagina: "Look at my honey pot: I am a female, so go on the knee and worship me.' But they would never be looking at nude males, that why one dress the crucified carefully with loincloths, else one would have to restrict the audience to adult males only.
View attachment 1156236
So I only get crucified when I have a bush? Well, that's another reason te keep it then. As for female company: I would be satisfied when I'm crucified together with a woman as long as she can see me hanging. :D
 
So I only get crucified when I have a bush? Well, that's another reason te keep it then. As for female company: I would be satisfied when I'm crucified together with a woman as long as she can see me hanging. :D
You see how difficult it is to get crucified? I think, after intensive studies of the pictures here, that you anyway should be a beautiful young female, else your chances to be tortured, nude exposed and crucified tend to be zero. Probably, we should look for another hobby. I was considering building model railroads, but those are damn expensive.
 
You see how difficult it is to get crucified? I think, after intensive studies of the pictures here, that you anyway should be a beautiful young female, else your chances to be tortured, nude exposed and crucified tend to be zero. Probably, we should look for another hobby. I was considering building model railroads, but those are damn expensive.
Never say never. It takes only one willing executioner. And female hanging company is almost guaranteed :p.

PS Judging from what I have seen here I even have the impression that males are more frequently crucified for real than females.
 
Last edited:
Never say never. It takes only one willing executioner. And female hanging company is almost guaranteed :p.

PS Judging from what I have seen here I even have the impression that males are more frequently crucified for real than females.
I looked at the pics.... Most are not shaved, few are shaved, actually two of them are here, the other is Vlada. What should we do? Shout we punish all who do not remove that ugly hair by crucifixion, or should we crucify all who are shaved, because that looks much better, or should we psychologically understandable only crucify females, because we can not decide that problem?


shavednot.jpg
 
I looked at the pics.... Most are not shaved, few are shaved, actually two of them are here, the other is Vlada. What should we do? Shout we punish all who do not remove that ugly hair by crucifixion, or should we crucify all who are shaved, because that looks much better, or should we psychologically understandable only crucify females, because we can not decide that problem?


View attachment 1156333
"Shout we punish all who do not remove that ugly hair by crucifixion"

Go ahead. Other methods of execution are ok as well.
 
"Shout we punish all who do not remove that ugly hair by crucifixion"

Go ahead. Other methods of execution are ok as well.
As humanist, I say those who are not shaved have to wear loincloth, during the whole crucifixion, only the shaved ones are allowed to expose themselves, that is for both genders: For example that female would never be allowed to be crucified without loincloth:

unshaved.jpg


or that male!

739_1000.jpg
 
As humanist, I say those who are not shaved have to wear loincloth, during the whole crucifixion, only the shaved ones are allowed to expose themselves, that is for both genders: For example that female would never be allowed to be crucified without loincloth:

View attachment 1156337


or that male!

View attachment 1156338
"only the shaved ones are allowed to expose themselves"

I disagree. For obvious reasons :D.
 
Well, since I initiated this thread I guess I'm obliged to give a proper example myself. Although for females I prefer some trimming (landing strip or even a complete triangle, some hair is better than no hair at all) I have a different standard or preference for myself. I'm not shaven or trimmed at all down there. My pubic hair has been part of me for a very long time. I never did any shaving since the first few curly representatives of my bush appeared. It belongs to me. It shapes and accentuates my silhouette when I am without clothing. I have no intention to change that. If my executioner thinks otherwise it is up to him or her to trim it or take it off.
Fifty years ago, pubic hair was a (private) sign of (at last) growing up. So, I consider it as a physical part of being adult and of an adult, mature body. So, no reason to shave me, and the same for women : I prefer them with their ‘mythical forest’ preserved.

Related to the ‘kink’, for crucified, nudity is the humiliation, but rather ‘natural nudity’, meaning, with pubic hair (M/F). Conversely, against many opinions, shaven does not mean for me ‘more nudity’ and hence ‘more humiliation’.
 
Fifty years ago, pubic hair was a (private) sign of (at last) growing up. So, I consider it as a physical part of being adult and of an adult, mature body. So, no reason to shave me, and the same for women : I prefer them with their ‘mythical forest’ preserved.

Related to the ‘kink’, for crucified, nudity is the humiliation, but rather ‘natural nudity’, meaning, with pubic hair (M/F). Conversely, against many opinions, shaven does not mean for me ‘more nudity’ and hence ‘more humiliation’.
Yep!
 
In a way unshaven means more nudity to me. At least for the men.
I never saw it that way. I haven been shaven on two occasions as a preparation for a medical surgery. It did not make me feel 'more naked', and I was just confident it would grow back. On the other hand, of course, pubic hair does not either feel to me like a cover, concealing nudity..
 
On the other hand, of course, pubic hair does not either feel to me like a cover, concealing nudity..

That's the point. It doesn't conceal anything. It rather accentuates your genital region. It's actually part of it and it is perceived as such in our society. In that sense your more exposed when it is visible and you're, in a way, more naked. The exposure exposure adds up to the humiliation and therewith fulfills the same role as literal nudity.
 
Back
Top Bottom