Oh, stripped indeed.
Or at least I'd be wearing a loose loincloth that would slowly fall away after I'm raised up, leaving me utterly naked. Not that I'd care that much -- or probably even notice -- at that point, what with all the agony I'd be in.
But since, as a female, I'd certainly be raped before crucifixion, why would I still be wearing a loincloth when I'm nailed to my cross?
Based on the artwork I've seen here so far, fully naked is probably what would actually happen. Although, a loosely fitting loincloth around a woman's hips has its sexy appeal.
Ooops! I my have missed the point of the thread. I assume I would be stripped and not forced to strip myself. Making the victim undress herself is certainly interesting. Is that more humiliating for her than being stripped my her executioners? Tough call, that.
Having the victim strip herself makes more a sport of her execution. And if there's only a few victims (let's say, all women, for the sake of discussion) perhaps the time could be made for a little forced striptease. If there's lots of victims, no doubt the executioners would take charge of the disrobing.
But that begs the question of why so many really attractive women (and I'll slip myself into that group for the sake of argument) were being executed. It sort of reminds me of a line from the
Princess Bride movie I think, when the handsome male lead dissuades Buttercup from stabbing a dagger into her breast because there are so few perfect breasts in the world (if I'm remembering the scene correctly). Oh well, in a fantasy all us ladies can be VS models, right?
Enough babbling on my part. Sometimes I just cannot stop!