Loxuru
Graf von Kreuzigung
History is full of warnings. But the future is shaped by people's short memory.
I finally convinced myself to post this story. I had started it over a year ago and then got bogged down. I recently pulled it out of the swamp again, realizing it would be now or waiting yet another year. I must confess that, by this moment, the last chapters are still under construction. Not my usual way of working, but I still have two weeks to solve it.
Whatever, putting the writing aside for a year has made it just darker, its setting more dystopic, its subject more controversial. Probably, because during the last year, many people's memory has shortened a little bit more, as events have shown.
The story plays my favorite theme : the struggle of the individual against the power of a world he or she does not want to live in. A struggle that is lost in advance, and which has, on CF, predictable consequences.
I hope you enjoy it and that you will not get lost in the storyline, jumping back and forth through times.
PART 1 : AD 2071.
A university in Western Europe, the Faculty of Ancient History. The office of Prof. Julia Bersel.
“Professor Bersel, the Board of Peers forbids the publication of this paper! It is entirely speculative, scientifically unfounded. Making this content public will harm our Institution and its reputation!”
“The Board has no authority to forbid its publication!”
“You know well, professor, that publishers always seek advice from the Board. Usually they follow that advice and refuse the paper without submitting it for external peer review!”
“Unless, I add a sound motivation! I am entitled to have the last word in such matters!”
“You are right, Professor, you have the right to reply, but remember that, once the verdict of the Board has been made, ignoring a negative advice from the Board of Peers to submit a publication, could have disciplinary consequences, as its content could be endangering the reputation of the University!”
“We are diverting from the subject! This discussion is not about my ideas, but about what is in the source documents.”
“The Board is convinced that this source document you refer to, is a forgery! A mock up! An invented story! There is no proof of its authenticity!”
“It is authentically Middle Aged!”
“Sure! But it is an invented story! Invented during the Middle Ages!”
“I am convinced it was based and largely copied from an older, authentic account!”
“Do not try to convince us, Professor, the Board has made up its decision already! It will advise not to publish! Based on sound considerations! The Board will report such to the Office of the Dean. We will furthermore add an advice to the Dean to prevent, or rather forbid you to do more research on this subject during the time you have to commit yourself to university work!”
“What about Academic Freedom?”
“Professor, Academic Freedom is an illusion!”
“In that case, I still can publish in a popularizing format. Without mentioning my affiliation to the University! My academic titles properly will make me sufficiently qualified to make it believable.”
“Professor Bersel, I am afraid I have to report that statement to the Office of the Dean too!”
(to be continued)
I finally convinced myself to post this story. I had started it over a year ago and then got bogged down. I recently pulled it out of the swamp again, realizing it would be now or waiting yet another year. I must confess that, by this moment, the last chapters are still under construction. Not my usual way of working, but I still have two weeks to solve it.
Whatever, putting the writing aside for a year has made it just darker, its setting more dystopic, its subject more controversial. Probably, because during the last year, many people's memory has shortened a little bit more, as events have shown.
The story plays my favorite theme : the struggle of the individual against the power of a world he or she does not want to live in. A struggle that is lost in advance, and which has, on CF, predictable consequences.
I hope you enjoy it and that you will not get lost in the storyline, jumping back and forth through times.
PART 1 : AD 2071.
A university in Western Europe, the Faculty of Ancient History. The office of Prof. Julia Bersel.
“Professor Bersel, the Board of Peers forbids the publication of this paper! It is entirely speculative, scientifically unfounded. Making this content public will harm our Institution and its reputation!”
“The Board has no authority to forbid its publication!”
“You know well, professor, that publishers always seek advice from the Board. Usually they follow that advice and refuse the paper without submitting it for external peer review!”
“Unless, I add a sound motivation! I am entitled to have the last word in such matters!”
“You are right, Professor, you have the right to reply, but remember that, once the verdict of the Board has been made, ignoring a negative advice from the Board of Peers to submit a publication, could have disciplinary consequences, as its content could be endangering the reputation of the University!”
“We are diverting from the subject! This discussion is not about my ideas, but about what is in the source documents.”
“The Board is convinced that this source document you refer to, is a forgery! A mock up! An invented story! There is no proof of its authenticity!”
“It is authentically Middle Aged!”
“Sure! But it is an invented story! Invented during the Middle Ages!”
“I am convinced it was based and largely copied from an older, authentic account!”
“Do not try to convince us, Professor, the Board has made up its decision already! It will advise not to publish! Based on sound considerations! The Board will report such to the Office of the Dean. We will furthermore add an advice to the Dean to prevent, or rather forbid you to do more research on this subject during the time you have to commit yourself to university work!”
“What about Academic Freedom?”
“Professor, Academic Freedom is an illusion!”
“In that case, I still can publish in a popularizing format. Without mentioning my affiliation to the University! My academic titles properly will make me sufficiently qualified to make it believable.”
“Professor Bersel, I am afraid I have to report that statement to the Office of the Dean too!”
(to be continued)