• Sign up or login, and you'll have full access to opportunities of forum.

Slavery

Go to CruxDreams.com
A slavegirl has been delivered.
Uncollared, unshackled, unbranded
but demure, and obedient.

Ordered but not picked up?

Who will rightfully take possession?


OP9sT1F.jpg
 

Attachments

  • Dungeon slave.jpg
    Dungeon slave.jpg
    1 MB · Views: 448
  • humiliation 5in dungeon.jpg
    humiliation 5in dungeon.jpg
    344.3 KB · Views: 469
  • Slave taken by the Comtes african guards 2.jpg
    Slave taken by the Comtes african guards 2.jpg
    1.2 MB · Views: 463
What's about this slave?
Maybe she has not enough "glamour" but she has a big ass where there is a lot of meat to grab :D
01.jpg
All the best,
Dafnees
 
Too much talking let the pictures speak, some nice pics by Miguel
 

Attachments

  • 01.png
    01.png
    985.6 KB · Views: 373
  • 02 (1).png
    02 (1).png
    918.3 KB · Views: 376
  • 03 (1).png
    03 (1).png
    957 KB · Views: 368
  • 07.png
    07.png
    771.6 KB · Views: 365
  • 07b.png
    07b.png
    897.9 KB · Views: 346
  • 7FP4o3YJQYvtHt8yxQvZOt6BUrwXFexG1luwsSiceG6J7iSooltGzHkpqwJMIKUE.jpg
    7FP4o3YJQYvtHt8yxQvZOt6BUrwXFexG1luwsSiceG6J7iSooltGzHkpqwJMIKUE.jpg
    554.2 KB · Views: 357
  • 09 (1).png
    09 (1).png
    1.3 MB · Views: 356
  • 10 (2).png
    10 (2).png
    891.6 KB · Views: 364
  • 10.png
    10.png
    1 MB · Views: 343
  • 11.png
    11.png
    895.2 KB · Views: 375
Sorry, but evolution does definetely not abolish 'anything that is useless'. Indeed it just gives a smaller chance of reproduction to individuals who carry 'features' that have a negative effect on survivability.

Any feature that is 'positive' for survival within the currently existing environmental parameters is passed on more often.
Any feature that is 'neutral' for survival within the currently existing environmental parameters is passed on more often.
Any feature that is 'negative' for survival within the currently existing environmental parameters is passed on less often.

This makes a very big difference, because it guarantees diversity, which again is desperately needed once the environmental parameters change.
'Neutral' changes that do not hurt, are traded on and might become 'negative' or 'positive' once the environmental parameters change.

This is, for example, why we (and lots of animanl species) enjoy such a lot of 'unproductive' sexual behaviour that, according to the maximising and optimizing ideology of popular ideas about evolution should be erased from the gene pool.
What a luck! Because otherwise none of us would be here :)

The remains of body hair on human beings are without doubt to send optic signals to mating partners. With other primates, like chimps and bonobonos, females show sexual availability with swollen genitalia. This became somewhat unpractical with the walking on two legs thingy. The primary sexual organs now were less visible, while especially the front and back view was much more prominent. This stimulated the development of secondary sexual organs (breasts and buttocks) and this funny little triangle pointing like an arrow to the interesting parts.

That's the biological signals that try to shout shout: "Hey there! Have sex with me!" (and certainly not "Hullo, how about spreading our genes?' as prissy biologists say).
But again (see neutral features) there is always a considerable number of individuals that react differently (no thank, I don't like big tits) or to different signals.

End of lecture, thank you for subscribing to Prof. Dr. Zungi's Online University, I'll send you my bill.
:greedy:
 
These discussions really un-fun threads like these :(
Well they can sort of change the sentiment of the thread but I'm definitely not going to say they shouldn't happen.
We have threads like 'Roman Resources' where people can argue what the Romans or other ancient people did or did not do,
maybe we need a 'Scientific controversy' for arguments about evolutionary psychology and whatnot ;)
 
Well they can sort of change the sentiment of the thread but I'm definitely not going to say they shouldn't happen.
We have threads like 'Roman Resources' where people can argue what the Romans or other ancient people did or did not do,
maybe we need a 'Scientific controversy' for arguments about evolutionary psychology and whatnot ;)
Yes, I think there's enough discussion here to justify a thread to itself,
I've moved the exchange to 'Shaving down there - for or against?' in Fantasy Unlimited
 
Yes, I think there's enough discussion here to justify a thread to itself,
I've moved the exchange to 'Shaving down there - for or against?' in Fantasy Unlimited
Well if the question arises in the context of slavery the answer is of course very simple, whatever Master commands....
 
Back
Top Bottom