Thanks for the reply, phlebas. Of course "genital size" is a matter of "taste", too. But in my opinion an already "naked" crux depiction does in most cases not need an alteration of that type. I mean, if I want to get to get "inspired" by a crux pic, I prefer certain body types, that may be different for others, but the overall-impression should feel "natural". If I may name an example, the work by Thomas Mahoney is an excellent style according to my own "taste". The victims are naked but you never get the impression that the crucifixion is an "presentation tablet for oversized cocks" neither the victims have genitals looking as if there would be a porn actor hanging on the cross.
These three are my favorites my Mahoney. Too bad he has retired.
View attachment 737064View attachment 737065View attachment 737066
best regards
Ty.