H
Whip marks, bruises, scrapes and so on, they all add to the realism of the scene. The images without such enhancements are still erotic but in a surreal way, not a real way. Add perspiration, sunburn, drool, etc.My first poll
I can not decide. I like both.My first poll
I think whipmarks are best when they are subtle, to make it clear that this is a torturous affair, but obvious that the cross is the most painful part of it. IMHO, I feel like showing a woman who has been totally shredded by flagellation hanging on the cross or no, that is her torture, and she can barely feel anything else, and it's just a touch too brutal visually. But with (somewhat) neat whipping, it just enhances the perceived pain of the crux.
I like both up to a point. I don't really like a victim that is whipped and beaten up so much that her beauty is destroyed; as realistic as that might be, it's not a turn on for me. For others it's no doubt different, just my own feelings on the subject.
Whip marks, bruises, scrapes and so on, they all add to the realism of the scene. The images without such enhancements are still erotic but in a surreal way, not a real way. Add perspiration, sunburn, drool, etc.
I really appreciate the pubic hair. Again, adds to the realism. Doesn't have to be a full bush, but should look like natural growth or regrowth. However, it depends on the setting. A woman tried and condemned over a very short period of time (a day or two) by, say, a summary court, might have a meticulously trimmed patch.
I think whipmarks are best when they are subtle, to make it clear that this is a torturous affair, but obvious that the cross is the most painful part of it. IMHO, I feel like showing a woman who has been totally shredded by flagellation hanging on the cross or no, that is her torture, and she can barely feel anything else, and it's just a touch too brutal visually. But with (somewhat) neat whipping, it just enhances the perceived pain of the crux.
Whipping before crucifixion is necessary... But not hard, not brutal...
It's like a ritual...
I do not want to pay attention to the aspects of the real crucifixion... Like in "Passion of the Christ" for example... Blood, gore... No, no, no...
I want to see exciting mix... Beautiful woman nailed to the crux, whipped, tortured may be... But not hard, without gore and other things that kill any aesthetic sense...
Agreed! Roughed up, abused, bruised, whipped, nailed, etc., but her beauty must shine through whatever is done to her. As a female, she must be displayed in a way that preserves and displays her innate beauty -- that's the crux fantasy done best.I like both up to a point. I don't really like a victim that is whipped and beaten up so much that her beauty is destroyed; as realistic as that might be, it's not a turn on for me. For others it's no doubt different, just my own feelings on the subject.
Interesting comment..let's not forget the perspiration, sunburn, drool, etc. ... and to be realistic what about pubic hair?
I've always been in favor of pubic hair in crux depictions. Adds the realism and the eroticism for me, and, I'm sure, many others on this site.
Ah, the never-ending debate between shaved and non-shaved!
Yes, mp5stab has the word .... subtle but not overdone ... just the right effect, right?
yes, preserve that aesthetic sense