Hammerlock said:
You know what, Slanece? I once heard a man say, "Tastes have a right to differ." Everyone has their own brand of interests regarding crucifixion, and I really love the way you've depicted it. I've never really liked the "sitting" posture on a cross; I much prefer the way you've done it. And I agree that your number 35 is totally hot--I, too, like depictions of crucifixion from behind, where the lady's backside is so enticingly displayed. Keep it up!
Exactly correct on all points, Hammerlock.
Slanece, we're into this kink because it's a turn-on.
Therefore do that which turns you on. Here's what I told the artist known as Ramon three years ago:
Ramon.
He would search the net for examples of crucified women in art and post them on the old Crux group.
On the new Crux group one "yttrandefrihet2000" started posting stills and clips from his website
http://www.passionofagoddess.com
It took me a while to get past my congenital cluelessness and realize that they were one in the same.
Mind you, I'm not into the Imitation of Christ kink. Rather the reverse. I prefer gritty, sweaty, bloody realism.
We're still trying to figure out exactly how the Romans ran a crucifixion, but the traditional image we have courtesy of Christianity is sanitized, physically impossible and just plain wrong. I also object to anything short of total nudity on general principles.
So here comes Ramon with his female Christ imitation, right down to the crown of thorns and loincloth. . .
. . . and absolutely took my breath away.
Amazing stuff, Ramon. This morbid literalist bows to your artistic and erotic vision.
Thanks.
viewtopic.php?f=10&t=44&st=0&sk=t&sd=a&start=45
I attach a few more of his pics.