• Sign up or login, and you'll have full access to opportunities of forum.
Go to CruxDreams.com
No offense, but this sounds kinda far fetched.
well, you got a fever thermometer up there and it is no big deal, isn't it? Is it not our(!) twisted thinking which correlates a penetration with an inamimated object, such as a cornu or a fever thermometer, or the camera for the colonoscopy, with sex, where it has to be 2 males and a real penis and a real asshole to be that kind of thing? So we are allways thinking about sex instead of something else.
 
Ho, now you challenged the professor in me! Yes, today we use gay and homosexual as synonyms. But looking at the words, then homo=homos greek for equal. i know, and you to i hope, know the the homonuclear molecules from chemistry, that are molecules with identical nuclei, elements, so for example oxygen O_2, or nitrogen N_2, or naturaly O_3, eg. ozone are homonuclear molecules, we can go even to "group sex" with sulfur, which (the yellow one!) is composed of 8 atoms, so S_8, or naturaly, and then it becomes unhealthy, the famous buckminsterfullerene consists of 60 carbon atoms! https://www.compoundchem.com/2016/05/02/buckyballs/

And gay i associate with gay lifestyle.....
Well, according to this logic, me submitting to a man for my girlfriend's pleasure's sake would be homosexual. However, common parlance defines homosexual and gay as the same thing - and to be honest, I simply don't even like the hypothetical possibility of being called homosexual, so let's just leave it at that! :D
no for me that is not hypothetical, I once was then 52(!) wanted to find out how that kind of sex is and offered a collegue of mine, we even did nude foto shots together, so not just a gay I knew, that he can fuck me. But he in some sense refused and it ended by hiring a black escort and this one used 2(!) session to actually penetrate me and a masseur I later sometimes visited needed even more time, well he was very well equiped.
As a teenager, I blew the dick of a friend of mine out of curiosity. That was the moment when I definitely knew I'm not gay or homosexual or whatever you call it, lol.
Wish you all the best.
Thank you! I love and adore her!
 
Well, according to this logic, me submitting to a man for my girlfriend's pleasure's sake would be homosexual. However, common parlance defines homosexual and gay as the same thing - and to be honest, I simply don't even like the hypothetical possibility of being called homosexual, so let's just leave it at that! :D
Hoho, all my homonuclear molecules are deeply offended! Haha!
 
I would like to know this woman, too. :D

But seriously, what do you mean by "And she's empathic, too, I'm sure"? Either she is or she isn't. BDSM is a very delicate topic that needs boundaries, safe words and aftercare. I mean seriously, any breach of consent can lead to trauma. That would literally be rape. Especially in a situation like being pegged, in which you are as vulnerable and exposed as possible.
Sometimes, you desire suffer more than you think you can. So, she knows it and where can we arrive. She knows me and my autentic limits, I know. Its the reason I talk about her empathy
 
Serious question: Was the cornu as depicted in this forum actually a thing? Or was it just a(n uncomfortable) seat?

To be honest, I'm asking this question because the idea of Jesus being anally penetrated by his cross makes me kinda uncomfortable.
I think Jesus was not penetrated by a cornu. He died in few hours. With a cornu his agony would spent 1 day or more possibly. But Im not religious and dont think about it
 
I think they would be, with a cornu stuck up them!

I'm a bit surprised that females prefer anal to vaginal, though only by a narrow margin.
I think is more hard and give you more pain, immobilisation and humiliation to be impaled by your ass than by the vagina. Its more exciting for the crowd, more realustic, and women as exhibitionist know it
 
To be honest, I'm asking this question because the idea of Jesus being anally penetrated by his cross makes me kinda uncomfortable.
According to the Gospel of John, the thieves crucified alongside Christ were killed by soldiers who broke their legs. This had probably not worked if theiy had a cornu?

Nevertheless, I do not feel uncomfortable about the thought. If a cornu was common practice as part of a crucifixion, why make a exemption or give a privilige to a condemned, just because he claims to be the son of God? That favour would have been uncomfortable to me!
 
But the question still remains, was the cornu really a thing?
Well, who knows.... It was said by Seneca: " I see crosses there, not just of one kind but made in many different ways: some have their victims with head down to the ground; some impale their private parts; others stretch out their arms on the gibbet".

So there might be different forms. I think they used a cornu, when it was considered an humiliation for the crucified. So if not, they might not spent time for it." Now consider the famous case. Would it be a shame for a Jew then to be impaled like that? The answer is yes. Would it help to make the suffering longer? The answer is yes.
 
According to the Gospel of John, the thieves crucified alongside Christ were killed by soldiers who broke their legs. This had probably not worked if theiy had a cornu?

Nevertheless, I do not feel uncomfortable about the thought. If a cornu was common practice as part of a crucifixion, why make a exemption or give a privilige to a condemned, just because he claims to be the son of God? That favour would have been uncomfortable to me!
Exactly that is the idea, when you were visiting the crucifixion site, together with his mother and her employe Maria Magdalena, it is my idea to make you feel uncomfortable, else you begin to continue preaching that crazy ideas! The point mentionend with the legs is a good comment, so only Jesus had the cornu? That would be even more troubling, but would explain the astonishing when he died to early.
 
Well, who knows.... It was said by Seneca: " I see crosses there, not just of one kind but made in many different ways: some have their victims with head down to the ground; some impale their private parts; others stretch out their arms on the gibbet".

So there might be different forms. I think they used a cornu, when it was considered an humiliation for the crucified. So if not, they might not spent time for it." Now consider the famous case. Would it be a shame for a Jew then to be impaled like that? The answer is yes. Would it help to make the suffering longer? The answer is yes.
There do seem to be a few historical accounts that describle something that might be a cornu, but whether or not it was actually the same thing that we think about in here is uncertain, and even if it was, then it probably wasn't used in all crucifixions in any case.

Regarding the question as to whether or not Jesus was cruxed using a cornu, then there appears to be no actual record suggesting that this was the case, though of course the absence of evidence does not equate to the evidence of absence, so it's an open question and always will be (just as the question of whether or not Jesus was a real person and for that matter whether his crucixion actually took place or not) so ultimately we must all chose to believe whichever version of events we wish, at least pending the unlikely discovery of new information that can throw more light on this.

As a confirmed aetheist, I don't have a dog in this fight, so it really doesn't matter to me, but it is a fascinating subject I think
 
A thought if I may. An overlong Cornu could be used to accelerate the Jesus death. It would puncture the bowels and large amounts of bacteria and blood would result. Jesus didn’t seem to be too stressed when he was talking. A Cornu would permit him to breathe more normally. The blood dripping around the cornu would provide much entertainment for the Jesus haters.
 
A thought if I may. An overlong Cornu could be used to accelerate the Jesus death. It would puncture the bowels and large amounts of bacteria and blood would result. Jesus didn’t seem to be too stressed when he was talking. A Cornu would permit him to breathe more normally. The blood dripping around the cornu would provide much entertainment for the Jesus haters.
One can add a psalm (34,20): He keepeth all his bones: not one of them is broken.

well overlong is very short, means more than 17 cm, try yourself you might be different than I am, sonce my try showed an even somewhat smaller
and yes one can go beyond, but not without trickery...

ddf.jpg

What speaks for your theory is the following sentence:

Pathicus is a Latin term (which supposedly comes from an unrecorded Greek term) for a man who enjoys
and seeks out being the passive partner during sexual encounters
.
Usually, this meant being the receptive partner during anal sex.
The word was often used derogatorily by Roman politicians to discredit their opponents.


So one might have triied to visualize it with Jesus, which was a clearly political issue, think of the King of Jews plate. However,
that would have been mentionend on the bible, I guess.
 
Back
Top Bottom