• Sign up or login, and you'll have full access to opportunities of forum.
Go to CruxDreams.com
Forced to fuck yourself by the dildo. If not, you can be violated by the anus
fucked and humiliated before cross. I like to be penetrate by a Woman executioner. But it’s a good idea to force to fuck yourself in that position
 
The evidence is called Puzzuoli Graffito.

That's this, you refer to?
View attachment 1309768

Well I dont really see evidence of the existance of the cornu in Roman sources or even in this graffiti (Which is a well known graffiti denigrating what the Romans called ‘the crucified god of the Christians’). I mean, if this was real wouldnt there have been mention of it in Tacitus, or even more so Josephus? I mean Josephus explains for example how the Roman legions besieging Jerusalem crucified many so-called jews in many different positions and were very creative about them. Again, no mention of a device in the ass.

Dont get me wrong, I really could believe the Romans to be capable of this because of their sexualized culture and extreme abhorrence to feminized males and harlots. (Contrary to popular belief, most Romans were extremely traditional, even prudish to our standards.). So a male or female getting raped by a piece of wood and even ejaculating in public would be seen as the worst form of humiliation that existed.

But again, no evidence of this really exists, and the so-called ‘rape’ was usually done before the crucifixion. (but I do not believe this happened to Christ because of special rules that existed in Judea and His special status as being unjustly persecuted and Him being recognized by Pilate as being ‘the King of the Jews’. Not just Him claiming to be as it being written on his nameplate.

Again I really like the idea of the cornu and I find it sexy and a turn-on (except if it is being used with Christ and other religious imagery). But I do not know of any real evidence of it being associated with the cross. I mean the cross execution wasnt invented by the Romans. The Carthaginians, Persians ans probably even the Assyrians used it before them. And again no mention of a ‘fucking device’ anywhere. And their cultures were alot more ‘degenerate’ and sexualized than the Romans ever were, with their fertility temple cults (were young virgins from the nobility were used as temple whores) and child-sacrifice. Most of the most degenerate shit that the Romans were accused of came from the east, like the practice of self-castration or whoring yourself out to appease the fertility gods (see Emperor Elagalabus).
Again the Romans were very traditional and prudish to our standards, best compared to the Spartans (The ideal man was the filosopher and/or warrior, and the ideal woman was the proud housewife best seen in the image of noble Lucretia.) The Romans tried many times to ban these excesses, including the cults of Bacchus, Baal and even Mithras. But to no avail. As is read in Livy and seen in the Myth of Pentheus.

So my point is. I do not believe the cornu to be an historical fact till I see alot more evidence. That of course doesnt mean the idea cannot be enjoyed (but it still being a modern anachronistic addition).
 
So my point is. I do not believe the cornu to be an historical fact till I see alot more evidence. That of course doesnt mean the idea cannot be enjoyed (but it still being a modern anachronistic addition).
I recently learned that even sitting on the sedile might be considered as sexual degrading, since there was that sexual technique of rubbing the genitals to each others legs, today we would probably say petting. So our fixation on anal penetrations might be modern and only in our first world society relevant.
 
I think Jesus was not penetrated by a cornu. He died in few hours. With a cornu his agony would spent 1 day or more possibly. But Im not religious and dont think about it
The quick dying came as surprise and while you are not religious, others are and it is interesting to speculate how religious people react by leaarning that Jesus was crucified with a sexual attitude. For me, I am religious in a fundamental sense, it makes more sense of the crucifixion and it has lead me to a new interpretation of the whole gay versus church debate. One hint on the cornu debate: If penetrative gay sex would be "unnatural" and "forbidden" would it then be possible for most of the humans? I rather think not. And the same for cornus: I am not sure if the Romans used them, but in a Roman mindset the cornu+cross is a depiction of the God Priapus and the crucifixion is a symbol of "fucked by the state". For Romans it is also degrading for a male, if he is used like that, even if not voluntearly. For us today that all does not matter, so a lot of the horror of the crucifixion ment for Romans we are just missing.

gettyimages-152200231-612x612.jpg statue of Priapus.
 
Females may prefer anal over vaginal, however, proficient carpenters should possess the capability to disregard their personal preferences. How much longer will they persist in denying the inevitable? (The females I mean, not the carpenters) :demon7:
 

Attachments

  • VI05.jpg
    VI05.jpg
    152.7 KB · Views: 306
  • VI04.jpg
    VI04.jpg
    152.7 KB · Views: 297
  • VI03.jpg
    VI03.jpg
    152.3 KB · Views: 281
  • VI02.jpg
    VI02.jpg
    152.6 KB · Views: 290
  • VI01.jpg
    VI01.jpg
    152.1 KB · Views: 295
Last edited:
Females may prefer anal over vaginal, however, proficient carpenters should possess the capability to disregard their personal preferences. How much longer will they persist in denying the inevitable? (The females I mean, not the carpenters) :demon7:
Looks like a properly big cornu there!
 
Females may prefer anal over vaginal, however, proficient carpenters should possess the capability to disregard their personal preferences. How much longer will they persist in denying the inevitable? (The females I mean, not the carpenters) :demon7:
To my questionnaire it is about half-half. When you have sex with females, due to my experience, very few allow you the use of the "little hole". The vagina seems to be larger in diameter (well babys comes out there on a yearly base), but the colon is deeper and can swallow "long" things. I am for the use of anal cornu due to many reasons.

- The gender equality on cross
- if the anus is penetrated, the vagina is nicely displayed for the audience
- in most societies, anal sex is considerded perverse so the humiliation is bigger.
- the chance is great that the crucified female would or has declined anal sex with me, so their sign (titulus crucis) is
(H.D.A.S.W.D) "Has Declined Anal Sex With Dfg42"
 
Last edited:
To my questionnaire it is about half-half. When you have sex with females, due to my experience, very few allow you the use of the "little hole". The vagina seems to be larger in diameter (well babys comes out there on a yearly base), but the colon is deeper and can swallow "long" things. I am for the use of anal cornu due to many reasons.

- The gender equality on cross
- if the anus is penetrated, the vagina is nicely displayed for the audience
- in most societies, anal sex is considerded perverse so the humiliation is bigger.
- the chance is great that the crucified female would or has declined anal sex with me, so their sign (titulus crucis) is
(H.D.A.S.W.D) "Has Declined Anal Sex With Dfg42"

I love that question "cunt or arsehole", I remember it coming up in a story some years ago where the female character said something like "my cunt is a gift from God", so she chose what you call the little hole. For some reason I can never find that story when I look for it (unless it was on Crux Foundation?). You would like it DF, both the male and female protagonists get it up the rear passage, quite graphically as I recall.

(H.D.A.S.W.D) "Has Declined Anal Sex With Dfg42"

A club that I aspire to join!
 
Females may prefer anal over vaginal, however, proficient carpenters should possess the capability to disregard their personal preferences. How much longer will they persist in denying the inevitable? (The females I mean, not the carpenters) :demon7:
Looks like you might be making an animation? Good GOD yes please. Your first animation was stunningly hot
 
To my questionnaire it is about half-half. When you have sex with females, due to my experience, very few allow you the use of the "little hole". The vagina seems to be larger in diameter (well babys comes out there on a yearly base), but the colon is deeper and can swallow "long" things. I am for the use of anal cornu due to many reasons.

- The gender equality on cross
- if the anus is penetrated, the vagina is nicely displayed for the audience
- in most societies, anal sex is considerded perverse so the humiliation is bigger.
- the chance is great that the crucified female would or has declined anal sex with me, so their sign (titulus crucis) is
(H.D.A.S.W.D) "Has Declined Anal Sex With Dfg42"
Well, a proficient carpenter should maintain a more flexible approach. :cool:

A club that I aspire to join!
Me too provided that it includes all women who have both declined and accepted any form of sexual activity with me.

Looks like you might be making an animation? Good GOD yes please. Your first animation was stunningly hot
Thank you very much! Animation is currently being prepared and will be delivered shortly.
 
I love that question "cunt or arsehole", I remember it coming up in a story some years ago where the female character said something like "my cunt is a gift from God", so she chose what you call the little hole. For some reason I can never find that story when I look for it (unless it was on Crux Foundation?). You would like it DF, both the male and female protagonists get it up the rear passage, quite graphically as I recall.
Despite the fact, that it is fun to do it, it has interesting cultural and historic aspects and in the time of pornos on every cell phone and the lbtq movements it will be interesting to note how the society will be reacting on the dirty sex acts. So has a man to give up his ass, or else he will be a "homophobic" person?

Historically I cited the novel "Venus in India" by a Charles Deveraux, indicating, that anal sex is considered as non-sex in victorian ages (1890). On the other hand we have the anal rape of females or males in many movies between 1970 and now, like spetters, or your highness, or last tango in Paris or or....
as especially horrible, so indicating all anal sex is horrible

Yes, in my opinion males and females should both be on the receiving edge of anal sex, and remember, here on CF my questionnaire indicates, that more than half of the males would do it (in a game play scenario) and about a quart of the females. Well the females are divided in little and big hole one to one.

The scene in Spetters

spetters-1980-gay-scene-part-3.jpg

In your highness it is interestingly a Minotaur which does the penetration, while in Last tango it is Marlon Brando.
 
As promised, webm formatted and looping - you need to Right Click on the video and select "loop".

(I trust that I have not violated any rules here, this is a realy compact video).

As for a narrative, let's say that the speculative affection of women towards the arousal of men (rather than the men themselves) may occasionally pose a lethal threat.
 

Attachments

  • CrossVagCorn.webm
    295.3 KB
As promised, webm formatted and looping - you need to Right Click on the video and select "loop".

(I trust that I have not violated any rules here, this is a realy compact video).

As for a narrative, let's say that the speculative affection of women towards the arousal of men (rather than the men themselves) may occasionally pose a lethal threat.
What a great loop! Watching her go fuck herself for real, now that's something else!
 
Back
Top Bottom