D
Deleted member 33472
Guest
Miss Moore with flushy cheeks ... awww ... how cute !I am not a squirter ... well, maybe sometimes ... but definitely not!
Miss Moore with flushy cheeks ... awww ... how cute !I am not a squirter ... well, maybe sometimes ... but definitely not!
I totally agree! Shoes on an otherwise naked model are just incongruous! Especially if she, or he, is supposed to be a slave in an outdoor setting.The one thing that probably annoys me most in BDSM scenes is when the model gets to keep her shoes on. Especially if it is a role play where wearing shoes makes absolutely no sense for the submissive.
As an example, here are two scenes from an (otherwise awesome) movie where Calico Lane plays a patient in a mental ward:
View attachment 929281 View attachment 929282
I get it why she wears shoes in the first scene: It is her intake and she still wears the rest of her clothes, too. But why is she still wearing her shoes in the second scene after they tied her down for her treatment? That does not make any sense at all. Did no one think about how she could use her high heels as a weapon when kicking after an orderly?
On the other hand, I am completely fine if the model wears shoes for safety reasons. Like in this scene where Alina West is tied to the back of a car and then made to run behind it through the woods:
View attachment 929280
Shoes on an otherwise naked model are just incongruous! Especially if she, or he, is supposed to be a slave in an outdoor setting.
Any safety reasons are plausible. But mostly that highheels have only the reason to make the visual appearance of the women more attractive.Although I stay with what I wrote before: If the shoes are worn for safety reasons, it is a necessary evil I can live with. Imagine the model stepping on a sharp stone, cutting her feet.
I actually think that tan lines would be extremely realistic, if they were tan lines that matched the clothes of the era, that would be used in the fields. Not what most of the models would consider sexy.I guess another no-no would be tan-lines in any ancient or medieval setting.. I mean, I know Roman women occasionally wore a sort of bikini thing for bathing.. but tan lines look anachronistic and inappropriate for most scenarios.
Oh yes, a farmer’s tan, that’s something else entirely..When I first read the heading, I thought it was referring to crux, rather than BDSM. My answer was nails in the hands rather than wrists & lack of full nudity.
On BDSM, overacting is probably by biggest peeve.
I actually think that tan lines would be extremely realistic, if they were tan lines that matched the clothes of the era, that would be used in the fields. Not what most of the models would consider sexy.
I feel the same way about condoms. I prefer condoms are use in all commercial porn, as a worker-safety issue, but it definitely looks out of place in historical settings. I saw a porn video once of a Mistress-of-the-house using her slave for sex in the old US South. I was glad to see the (all to rare in hetero porn) condom, but it was slightly jarring. I think good CGI in the future will be cheap enough that porn studios will regularly use it to deal with issues like these.Although I stay with what I wrote before: If the shoes are worn for safety reasons, it is a necessary evil I can live with. Imagine the model stepping on a sharp stone, cutting her feet. That would definately be the end of the shoot (and probably an incoming lawsuit for the production company). Personally, I once accidentally stepped into a glass shard while barefoot and believe me, it was an experience I could have done without.
For the same reasons, I am also okay with the model sitting or kneeling on an inconspicious blanket during an outdoor shoot, as long the rest of the scene is good.
That's a very interesting point ! I'd never thought about this, but you are absolutely right !I actually think that tan lines would be extremely realistic, if they were tan lines that matched the clothes of the era, that would be used in the fields. Not what most of the models would consider sexy.
If they tie with rope and then nail the hands as well, that's the only exception to the nails-in-the-hand thing.Nails in hands are a peeve, but I still prefer that to no nails at all. Rope crux no longer works for me.
Yes.. CGI will just be short for “condom gone instantly”I feel the same way about condoms. I prefer condoms are use in all commercial porn, as a worker-safety issue, but it definitely looks out of place in historical settings. I saw a porn video once of a Mistress-of-the-house using her slave for sex in the old US South. I was glad to see the (all to rare in hetero porn) condom, but it was slightly jarring. I think good CGI in the future will be cheap enough that porn studios will regularly use it to deal with issues like these.
Workmans-safety first !I feel the same way about condoms. I prefer condoms are use in all commercial porn, as a worker-safety issue, but it definitely looks out of place in historical settings. I saw a porn video once of a Mistress-of-the-house using her slave for sex in the old US South. I was glad to see the (all to rare in hetero porn) condom, but it was slightly jarring. I think good CGI in the future will be cheap enough that porn studios will regularly use it to deal with issues like these.
If you are the person on the cross I'm pretty sure it works for you as well !Rope crux no longer works for me.
I was definitely thinking real person here.If they tie with rope and then nail the hands as well, that's the only exception to the nails-in-the-hand thing.
Rope crux still works for me, especially if it's a photo/video of a real person, but in artwork nailing is my preference.
Pardon me, my limited English leads me to a border again: Where does the condom go ?Yes.. CGI will just be short for “condom gone instantly”
CGI = Computer Generated Imagery. But since @JoeyRainbow suggested CGI could be used to remove visible condoms from movies, I wondered if CGI = Condoms Gone InstantlyPardon me, my limited English leads me to a border again: Where does the condom go ?
Thanks for the explanation !CGI = Computer Generated Imagery. But since @JoeyRainbow suggested CGI could be used to remove visible condoms from movies, I wondered if CGI = Condoms Gone Instantly
CGI is the future of real life crux videos.CGI = Computer Generated Imagery. But since @JoeyRainbow suggested CGI could be used to remove visible condoms from movies, I wondered if CGI = Condoms Gone Instantly
What does ImageMaker say to this point ?CGI is the future of real life crux videos.