Geeze!Yes she prefers combat boots
Geeze!Yes she prefers combat boots
.....the pose works for me(by the way that’s not how chairs work )
Sheesh, Monty! You'll be saying this isn't how beds work, next!by the way that’s not how chairs work
Nice quoting!And there was silence in the courtroom for the space of half an hour ...
I think You overestimate me a bit...observes the formidable figure of the Judge
Incriminating yourself in court!?As a matter of fact, as in many demented ramblings, there's a grain of truth - I did once lock out the entire membership, something no other staff member has ever managed to achieve, not even Barb Fortunately I was able, and cool-headed enough (to my surprise!) to reverse what I'd done. And it was due to something that had happened to our registration system that meant we couldn't block an unwanted member without blocking everyone else. But that wasn't the Great Crash - if I remember rightly, it was a glitch that cropped up when IM was restoring CF after the Crash.
.... who should say here : "Objection your honour! Biased statement!"Miss Moore. The fact that you accused an evident accomplice of yours (suffering from clear mental disorders) with the only purpose of wasting court's time just aggravates your position.
Which is why ImageMaker’s signature says, “never banned”?As a matter of fact, as in many demented ramblings, there's a grain of truth - I did once lock out the entire membership, something no other staff member has ever managed to achieve, not even Barb Fortunately I was able, and cool-headed enough (to my surprise!) to reverse what I'd done. And it was due to something that had happened to our registration system that meant we couldn't block an unwanted member without blocking everyone else. But that wasn't the Great Crash - if I remember rightly, it was a glitch that cropped up when IM was restoring CF after the Crash.
That goes back to a time when he banned a member by mistake, and in penance banned himself. Or at least put 'banned' as his title. But fairly recently someone took it seriously and was baffled by it, so her changed it to 'never banned'. I think that's roughly the story, anyway ...Which is why ImageMaker’s signature says, “never banned”?
Aha! Well, at least neither of us can be tried and crucified for that oneThat goes back to a time when he banned a member by mistake, and in penance banned himself. Or at least put 'banned' as his title. But fairly recently someone took it seriously and was baffled by it, so her changed it to 'never banned'. I think that's roughly the story, anyway ...
Don't worry, you will resurrect in a different thread after the execution, like you always do.Clearly, Eulalia is guilty, by her own admission, on two counts. And I am acquitted on the charge of causing the Great Crash, but appear to have gotten myself caught in contempt of court, which in this crazIly bizarre Alice-in-Wonderland-like thread, probably means I can look forward to the same execution sentence as she does, despite mine being a far lesser charge.
Sounds like good justice to me!Which is why ImageMaker’s signature says, “never banned”?
Well, as far as I’m concerned that makes it an open and shut case. Clearly, Eulalia is guilty, by her own admission, on two counts. And I am acquitted on the charge of causing the Great Crash, but appear to have gotten myself caught in contempt of court, which in this crazIly bizarre Alice-in-Wonderland-like thread, probably means I can look forward to the same execution sentence as she does, despite mine being a far lesser charge.
A clear case of witchcraft. This sorceress cast a spell that went wrong, denying many honest townspeople access to their own property; when she realised her mistake, she cast a spell of Undoing. She is clearly an accomplished and dangerous witch, and must be tortured until she reveals how often and in which positions she enjoys congress with the Devil. After that she may be burned or crucified at the pleasure of the court.I did once lock out the entire membership, something no other staff member has ever managed to achieve, not even Barb Fortunately I was able, and cool-headed enough (to my surprise!) to reverse what I'd done.
Hmm... I think there may be room for a mitigation of sentence. Depending on how kindly disposed the judge is to you, of course...Which is why ImageMaker’s signature says, “never banned”?
Well, as far as I’m concerned that makes it an open and shut case. Clearly, Eulalia is guilty, by her own admission, on two counts. And I am acquitted on the charge of causing the Great Crash, but appear to have gotten myself caught in contempt of court, which in this crazIly bizarre Alice-in-Wonderland-like thread, probably means I can look forward to the same execution sentence as she does, despite mine being a far lesser charge.
Rumblings of discontent issue from the Jury boxHmm... I think there may be room for a mitigation of sentence. Depending on how kindly disposed the judge is to you, of course...
Now now - I'm sure there are ways the defendant could make up for any disappointment in the jury.Rumblings of discontent issue from the Jury box